As per newly released data by Future Market Insights (FMI), the Slip Resistant Shoes Market is estimated at USD 1.49 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 2.67 Billion by 2033, at a CAGR of 6% from 2023 to 2033.
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Estimated Slip Resistant Shoes Market Size 2023 | US$ 1.49 Billion |
Projected Slip Resistant Shoes Market (2033) Market Size | US$ 2.67 Billion |
Value CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 6% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
Slip-resistant footwear differs from regular footwear in that it has rubber soles and tread designs that are better suited to greasy or damp floors. Some slip-resistant footwear is superior to other footwear. To ensure a worker does not slip, trip, or fall, 5-star, or highly rated, slip-resistant shoes often offer superior grip and other characteristics. The third most frequent category of non-fatal work-related injuries in the USA is slips, trips, and falls (STFs). Workers frequently take time off work because of STF injuries. Slip injuries among workers can be reduced with slip-resistant footwear.
The second most common cause of missed workdays in the general business is STFs (Slip, Trip, and fall) which can cause back sprains, bruises, contusions, strains, fractures, catastrophic head injuries, and even fatalities, and paralysis. STFs are the third most common type of occupational injury in WRT (Wholesale, Retail Trade establishments), and 75% of STF injuries in WRT occur at the same level.
Trips happen when a person's foot strikes an item or descends to a lower level, while slips happen when there is less friction between the shoe and the walking surface. Falls can happen because of either a trip or a slide. WRT workers are more likely to sustain STF injuries due to the constant handling and moving of products, among other risk factors. The incidence of STF injuries is higher among retail employees than among all workers in the private sector. Grocery stores and enterprises that handle meat employees are particularly in danger, with a rate that is 75% higher than the industry average for all other private industries combined. The following dangers have led to workplace slips, trips, and same-level falls: Spills on the walking surface, ice, rain, and snow can create outdoor slipping hazards, loose rugs and mats, boxes and containers, poor lighting visibility and walking surfaces that are disrepairs, have protruding nails and boards change in floor heights may cause STFS.
On slippery and wet terrain, the risk of slipping and falling can be decreased by wearing footwear with high slip resistance. Falls on slippery and damp surfaces can result in severe, potentially fatal injuries, especially for elderly people. Here, we demonstrate how rubber outsoles for shoes that contain salt chloride or activated carbon increase friction and decrease walking slippage. We have determined that during contact between the rubber and the surface, small depressions filled with salt chloride or activated carbon were produced on outsole materials, which allowed some air to enter the interface. Although air bubbles exist between the rubber and the surface, genuine contacts are encased in water that has a negative pressure (Laplace pressure). It is believed that the negative pressure encourages the establishment of genuine contact, which results in significant friction. We believe that materials for outsoles that contain sodium chloride or activated carbon can lessen the likelihood of slip-and-fall incidents.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
Although air bubbles exist between the rubber and the surface, genuine contacts are encased in water that has a negative pressure (Laplace pressure). It is believed that the negative pressure encourages the establishment of genuine contact, which results in significant friction. We believe that materials for outsoles that contain sodium chloride or activated carbon can lessen the likelihood of slip-and-fall incidents. Although you have insurance in place to safeguard your company's money in the future, you should always put the safety of your staff and clients first. Having your staff wear skid-resistant footwear while at work can significantly lower the risk of a slip and fall injury. High-heeled footwear or footwear with non-rubber soles might be hazardous. For everyone's safety, make sure to wear cozy shoes with rubber soles.
Due to the expansion in restaurants, USA demand for slip-resistant shoes would accelerate the growth of the shoe market.
Due to rising outdoor dining habits, the restaurant industry will hire more people, which will increase demand for the goods. The item is frequently used in the food service and restaurant industries to stop slippage because of water and oil spills on the floor. The expansion of the USA market for slip-resistant shoes will be a positive impact on the growing knowledge of how to prevent accidents in kitchens and restaurants. To produce excellent products and increase production effectiveness, manufacturers are investing heavily in new product launches and technical improvements. One of the key goals at fine dining establishments is the safety of the staff. Due to this, both employers and employees are now requesting high-traction, slip-resistant footwear. It will have a big impact on slip-resistant shoe sales in upscale eateries. The expansion of upscale dining outside and in outdoor settings is credited with driving industry growth.
Due to the constant use of water and oil while cooking meals, kitchen area flooring is typically slippery. To avoid mishaps, workers in the kitchen and food preparation facilities should wear slip-resistant footwear.
For instance, Clement Design added ADHERA to their product line-up in May 2018. The highest coefficient of adhesion ever recorded on the market has been achieved by it thus far. This has aided the business in diversifying its product offering. One of the best-gripping shoes in the world is ADHERA. According to tests conducted at the CTC (Technical Centre for Leather) in line with the European SRB standard, the grip coefficient achieved for this sole when tested on a steel surface covered in glycerine is 50% higher than that of rival products.
Mallcom India Launch its safety shoes for the hospitality sector.
With the release of the stylish lifestyle safety shoes Freddie, Mallcom India Limited, the nation’s first manufacturer of whole-body Personal Protection Equipment, has entered a new market. While the Central Government's initiatives on Worker's Health and Safety have assisted in the best acceptance of safety products and PPEs, the Company's Lifestyle Safety Shoe Range has set a benchmark for unparalleled quality that is designed to perform exceptionally well in almost every Work Environment but in Style.
The line's objective is to become a reputable manufacturer of high-end PPE items to shield workers from any potentially hazardous working conditions. To reduce the risk of slip or fall incidents, this shoe is especially useful for working in busy restaurant kitchens and food manufacturing facilities. It is the ideal solution for waiters, bartenders, janitors, chefs, grocery store clerks, and other workers who frequently work in hazardous floor conditions because of its anti-slip, breathable, puncture- and abrasion-resistant, brilliant color scheme, and aesthetics. The production of high-quality, secure, and slip-resistant footwear is essential in environments that are slippery, from grease and oil to soap, water, and chemicals.
It is vital to adopt modern technology and use them to innovate products without sacrificing the utility element. According to EN and BIS standards, our new line of safety shoes has undergone testing and certification.
Rubber Sole is the most popular Sole type in Slip Resistant Shoes Market
Shoes that are specifically made to prevent slipping in slick and wet circumstances are known as non-slip shoes. When walking on slick areas, these shoes' unique rubber outsoles offer a stronger grip. Non-slip footwear is extremely adaptable and useful in a variety of settings. These shoes provide peace of mind by greatly lowering the likelihood of trips, falls, and slips while keeping you secure and guarded against various injuries.
Synthetic materials are commonly used in the Slip Resistant Shoes Market.
The demand for synthetic materials is rising because of their similar appearance and feel to genuine leather without the ethical issues related to animal rights. These materials offer a better value proposition for producers because they are more affordable, long-lasting, and environmentally friendly than leather. Demand for synthetic materials is increasing as businesses strive to leave no carbon imprint.
Commonly, Men prefer Slip Resistant Shoes Market to women.
Men's slip-resistant shoes are widely available. Men choose to wear shoes more regularly since they engage in a variety of physical activities on a daily basis, but there are Slip Resistant Shoes Markets for women and kids as well. Shoes help with comfort and safety to some extent.
There is a number of brands that are providing special Slip Resistant Shoes for heavy physical activities and are suitable for workplaces as well. Many designer and luxury brands are also making Slip Resistant Shoes Market with unique designs, for exclusive prices. Manufacturers are investing heavily in the development of new products and technological breakthroughs in order to deliver high-quality goods and increase production effectiveness Chemical additions can change synthetic materials and make them waterproof.
For Instance:
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
Historical Data Available for | 2017 to 2022 |
Market Analysis | USD Billion for Value |
Key Regions Covered | North America; Latin America; Europe; East Asia; South Asia; Oceania & Middle East and Africa(MEA) |
Key Countries Covered | USA, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Northern Africa GCC Countries, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia & New Zealand. |
Key Segments Covered | Sole Type, Material Type, Consumer Orientation, Sales Channel, and Region. |
Key Companies Profiled | Crocs Inc.; KEEN, INC.; Shoes For Crews, LLC; Birkenstock Digital GmbH; Clement Design USA; Fila; Skechers USA, Inc.; Docker Shoes; Caleres, Inc.; NANOTECH CERAMICS CO., LTD.; Bravo Shoes; Others |
Report Coverage | Market Forecast, Company Share Analysis, Competition Intelligence, Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities and Threats Analysis, Market Dynamics and Challenges, and Strategic Growth Initiatives |
Customization & Pricing | Available upon Request |
The slip resistant shoes market is set to be worth US$ 1.49 billion in 2023.
The slip resistant shoes market is evolving at a 6% CAGR through 2033.
The slip resistant shoes market is expected to be worth US$ 2.67 billion by 2033.
The synthetics segment is the leading material type in the slip resistant shoes market.
India may gain prominent growth in the slip resistant shoes market.
1. Executive Summary | Slip Resistant Shoes Market 1.1. Global Market Outlook 1.2. Summary of Key Findings 1.3. Summary of Key Statistics 1.4. FMI Analysis and Recommendations 2. Market Overview 2.1. Market Taxonomy 2.2. Market Definition 3. Key Market Trends 3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Market 3.1.1. Millennials are Driving Force 3.1.2. Rapid Emergence of The Start-ups In the Market 3.1.3. Increasing Awareness about sustainability 3.1.4. Globalization Impacting Lifestyles 3.1.5. Consumers Selecting for At-home Services, Using e-Commerce 3.1.6. Others 3.2. Product Innovation Trends 3.2.1. Manufacturers Increasingly Spending on R&D and Stepping Up Eco-friendly material 3.2.2. Growing Consumer Interest in Multifunctional Products 3.2.3. Prominent Players are Now Diversifying Into other Profitable Segments 3.2.4. Evolution in Product Design 3.3. Future Prospects of the Leather Sneakers Industry 3.3.1. Factors Fuelling Growth 3.3.2. Influx of Brands 3.3.3. Innovative Distribution & Marketing Strategies 4. Market Demand Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast, 2022 to 2032 4.1. Historical Market Volume (Units) Analysis, 2017 to 2021 4.2. Current and Future Market Volume (Units) Projections, 2022 to 2032 4.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 5. Market - Pricing Analysis 5.1. Regional Pricing Analysis By Product Type 5.2. Pricing Break-up 5.2.1. Manufacturer-Level Pricing 5.2.2. Distributor Level Pricing 5.3. Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark 6. Market Demand (in Value or in US$ Million) Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast, 2022 to 2032 6.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Million) Analysis, 2017 to 2021 6.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Million) Projections, 2022 to 2032 6.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 6.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis 7. Market Background 7.1. Macro-Economic Factors 7.1.1. Global GDP Growth Outlook 7.1.2. Global Consumer Spending Outlook 7.1.3. Global Population and Income Level Growth Outlook 7.1.4. Global Apparel Industry Growth 7.1.5. GDP Growth Rate Analysis 7.1.6. Apparel Industry Contribution to GDP Outlook 7.1.7. Global E-Commerce Industry Outlook 7.1.8. Global Household Spending Outlook 7.1.9. Urbanization Growth Outlook 7.1.10. Global Male-Female Ratio Outlook 7.1.11. Per Capita Disposable Income 7.1.12. The outbreak of the Covid-19 Pandemic 7.1.13. Economic Instability 7.1.14. Impact of Online Sales 7.2. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact 7.2.1. Top Companies Historical Growth 7.2.2. Global Leather Sneakers Industry Assessment 7.2.3. Global Retail Sales Outlook 7.2.4. Manufacturing Sector Gross Value Added 7.2.5. Urbanization Growth Outlook 7.2.6. Consumer Price Index 7.2.7. Others 7.3. Purchase Pattern Assessment 7.3.1. Analysis Of Perception Towards Leather Sneakers 7.3.2. Analysis Of Preferred Purchase Mode 7.3.3. Analysis On The Consumption Pattern 7.3.4. Consumer Insights 7.3.5. Others (Pointers Will Be Developed During The Course of Study) 7.4. Industry Value and Supply Chain Analysis 7.5. Market Dynamics 7.5.1. Drivers 7.5.2. Restraints 7.5.3. Opportunity Analysis 7.6. PESTLE Analysis of Market 7.7. Investment Feasibility Matrix 7.8. Porter’s Five Force 8. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Sole Type 8.1. Introduction / Key Findings 8.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Sole Type, 2017 to 2021 8.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Sole Type, 2022 to 2032 8.3.1. Rubber 8.3.2. Synthetic 8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Sole Type 9. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Material Type 9.1. Introduction / Key Findings 9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Material Type, 2017 to 2021 9.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Material Type, 2022 to 2032 9.3.1. Leather 9.3.2. Synthetic 9.3.3. Others 9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material Type 10. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Consumer Orientation 10.1. Introduction / Key Findings 10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Consumer Orientation, 2017 to 2021 10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Consumer Orientation, 2022 to 2032 10.3.1. Men 10.3.2. Women 10.3.3. Kids 10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Consumer Orientation 11. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Sales Channel 11.1. Introduction / Key Findings 11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Sales Channel, 2017 to 2021 11.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Sales Channel, 2022 to 2032 11.3.1. Multi-brand Stores 11.3.2. Independent Small Stores 11.3.3. Online Retailers 11.3.4. Other Sales Channel 11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Sales Channel 12. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Region 12.1. Introduction 12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Region, 2017 to 2021 12.3. Current Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2022 to 2032 12.3.1. North America 12.3.2. Latin America 12.3.3. Europe 12.3.4. East Asia 12.3.5. South Asia 12.3.6. Oceania 12.3.7. Middle East and Africa(MEA) 12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region 13. North America Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 13.1. Introduction 13.2. Pricing Analysis 13.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 13.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 13.4.1. By Country 13.4.1.1. USA 13.4.1.2. Canada 13.4.2. By Sole Type 13.4.3. By Material Type 13.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 13.4.5. By Sales Channel 13.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 13.5.1. By Country 13.5.2. By Sole Type 13.5.3. By Material Type 13.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 13.5.5. By Sales Channel 14. Latin America Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 14.1. Introduction 14.2. Pricing Analysis 14.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 14.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 14.4.1. By Country 14.4.1.1. Brazil 14.4.1.2. Mexico 14.4.1.3. Rest of Latin America 14.4.2. By Sole Type 14.4.3. By Material Type 14.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 14.4.5. By Sales Channel 14.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 14.5.1. By Country 14.5.2. By Sole Type 14.5.3. By Material Type 14.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 14.5.5. By Sales Channel 15. Europe Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 15.1. Introduction 15.2. Pricing Analysis 15.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 15.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 15.4.1. By Country 15.4.1.1. United Kingdom 15.4.1.2. Germany 15.4.1.3. Italy 15.4.1.4. Spain 15.4.1.5. France 15.4.1.6. Russia 15.4.1.7. Rest of Europe 15.4.2. By Sole Type 15.4.3. By Material Type 15.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 15.4.5. By Sales Channel 15.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 15.5.1. By Country 15.5.2. By Sole Type 15.5.3. By Material Type 15.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 15.5.5. By Sales Channel 16. East Asia Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 16.1. Introduction 16.2. Pricing Analysis 16.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 16.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 16.4.1. By Country 16.4.1.1. China 16.4.1.2. Japan 16.4.1.3. South Korea 16.4.2. By Sole Type 16.4.3. By Material Type 16.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 16.4.5. By Sales Channel 16.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 16.5.1. By Country 16.5.2. By Sole Type 16.5.3. By Material Type 16.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 16.5.5. By Sales Channel 17. South Asia Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 17.1. Introduction 17.2. Pricing Analysis 17.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 17.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 17.4.1. By Country 17.4.1.1. India 17.4.1.2. Thailand 17.4.1.3. Malaysia 17.4.1.4. Indonesia 17.4.1.5. Rest of South Asia 17.4.2. By Sole Type 17.4.3. By Material Type 17.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 17.4.5. By Sales Channel 17.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 17.5.1. By Country 17.5.2. By Sole Type 17.5.3. By Material Type 17.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 17.5.5. By Sales Channel 18. Oceania Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 18.1. Introduction 18.2. Pricing Analysis 18.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 18.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 18.4.1. By Country 18.4.1.1. Australia 18.4.1.2. New Zealand 18.4.2. By Sole Type 18.4.3. By Material Type 18.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 18.4.5. By Sales Channel 18.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 18.5.1. By Country 18.5.2. By Sole Type 18.5.3. By Material Type 18.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 18.5.5. By Sales Channel 19. MEA Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032 19.1. Introduction 19.2. Pricing Analysis 19.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021 19.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032 19.4.1. By Country 19.4.1.1. GCC Countries 19.4.1.2. South Africa 19.4.1.3. Rest of Middle East and Africa(MEA) 19.4.2. By Sole Type 19.4.3. By Material Type 19.4.4. By Consumer Orientation 19.4.5. By Sales Channel 19.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis 19.5.1. By Country 19.5.2. By Sole Type 19.5.3. By Material Type 19.5.4. By Consumer Orientation 19.5.5. By Sales Channel 20. Key Countries Market Analysis 20.1. Introduction 20.1.1. Market Value Proportion Analysis, By Key Countries 20.1.2. Global Vs. Country Growth Comparison 20.2. USA Market Analysis 20.2.1. By Sole Type 20.2.2. By Material Type 20.2.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.2.4. By Sales Channel 20.3. Canada Market Analysis 20.3.1. By Sole Type 20.3.2. By Material Type 20.3.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.3.4. By Sales Channel 20.4. Mexico Market Analysis 20.4.1. By Sole Type 20.4.2. By Material Type 20.4.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.4.4. By Sales Channel 20.5. Brazil Market Analysis 20.5.1. By Sole Type 20.5.2. By Material Type 20.5.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.5.4. By Sales Channel 20.6. Germany Market Analysis 20.6.1. By Sole Type 20.6.2. By Material Type 20.6.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.6.4. By Sales Channel 20.7. Italy Market Analysis 20.7.1. By Sole Type 20.7.2. By Material Type 20.7.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.7.4. By Sales Channel 20.8. France Market Analysis 20.8.1. By Sole Type 20.8.2. By Material Type 20.8.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.8.4. By Sales Channel 20.9. United Kingdom Market Analysis 20.9.1. By Sole Type 20.9.2. By Material Type 20.9.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.9.4. By Sales Channel 20.10. Spain Market Analysis 20.10.1. By Sole Type 20.10.2. By Material Type 20.10.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.10.4. By Sales Channel 20.11. Russia Market Analysis 20.11.1. By Sole Type 20.11.2. By Material Type 20.11.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.11.4. By Sales Channel 20.12. China Market Analysis 20.12.1. By Sole Type 20.12.2. By Material Type 20.12.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.12.4. By Sales Channel 20.13. Japan Market Analysis 20.13.1. By Sole Type 20.13.2. By Material Type 20.13.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.13.4. By Sales Channel 20.14. South Korea Market Analysis 20.14.1. By Sole Type 20.14.2. By Material Type 20.14.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.14.4. By Sales Channel 20.15. India Market Analysis 20.15.1. By Sole Type 20.15.2. By Material Type 20.15.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.15.4. By Sales Channel 20.16. ASEAN Market Analysis 20.16.1. By Sole Type 20.16.2. By Material Type 20.16.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.16.4. By Sales Channel 20.17. Australia and New Zealand Market Analysis 20.17.1. By Sole Type 20.17.2. By Material Type 20.17.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.17.4. By Sales Channel 20.18. Turkey Market Analysis 20.18.1. By Sole Type 20.18.2. By Material Type 20.18.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.18.4. By Sales Channel 20.19. South Africa Market Analysis 20.19.1. By Sole Type 20.19.2. By Material Type 20.19.3. By Consumer Orientation 20.19.4. By Sales Channel 21. Market Structure Analysis 21.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies 21.2. Market Concentration 21.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players 21.4. Market Presence Analysis 21.4.1. By Regional footprint of Players 21.4.2. Product foot print by Players 21.4.3. Channel Foot Print by Players 22. Competition Analysis 22.1. Competition Dashboard 22.2. Pricing Analysis by Competition 22.3. Competition Benchmarking 22.4. Competition Deep Dive 22.4.1. Crocs INC., 22.4.1.1. Overview 22.4.1.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.1.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.1.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.2. KEEN, INC. 22.4.2.1. Overview 22.4.2.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.2.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.2.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.3. Shoes For Crews, LLC 22.4.3.1. Overview 22.4.3.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.3.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.3.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.4. Birkenstock Digital GmbH 22.4.4.1. Overview 22.4.4.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.4.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.4.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.5. Clement Design USA 22.4.5.1. Overview 22.4.5.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.5.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.5.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.6. Fila 22.4.6.1. Overview 22.4.6.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.6.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.6.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.7. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. 22.4.7.1. Overview 22.4.7.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.7.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.7.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.8. Docker Shoes 22.4.8.1. Overview 22.4.8.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.8.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.8.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.9. Caleres, Inc. 22.4.9.1. Overview 22.4.9.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.9.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.9.5. Strategy Overview 22.4.10. Others (As per Request) 22.4.10.1. Overview 22.4.10.2. Product Portfolio 22.4.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 22.4.10.4. Distribution Footprint 22.4.10.5. Strategy Overview 23. Assumptions and Acronyms Used 24. Research Methodology
Explore Consumer Product Insights
View Reports