As per newly released data by Future Market Insights (FMI), the Slip Resistant Shoes Market is estimated at USD 1.49 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 2.67 Billion by 2033, at a CAGR of 6% from 2023 to 2033.
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Estimated Slip Resistant Shoes Market Size 2023 | US$ 1.49 Billion |
Projected Slip Resistant Shoes Market (2033) Market Size | US$ 2.67 Billion |
Value CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 6% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
Slip-resistant footwear differs from regular footwear in that it has rubber soles and tread designs that are better suited to greasy or damp floors. Some slip-resistant footwear is superior to other footwear. To ensure a worker does not slip, trip, or fall, 5-star, or highly rated, slip-resistant shoes often offer superior grip and other characteristics. The third most frequent category of non-fatal work-related injuries in the USA is slips, trips, and falls (STFs). Workers frequently take time off work because of STF injuries. Slip injuries among workers can be reduced with slip-resistant footwear.
The second most common cause of missed workdays in the general business is STFs (Slip, Trip, and fall) which can cause back sprains, bruises, contusions, strains, fractures, catastrophic head injuries, and even fatalities, and paralysis. STFs are the third most common type of occupational injury in WRT (Wholesale, Retail Trade establishments), and 75% of STF injuries in WRT occur at the same level.
Trips happen when a person's foot strikes an item or descends to a lower level, while slips happen when there is less friction between the shoe and the walking surface. Falls can happen because of either a trip or a slide. WRT workers are more likely to sustain STF injuries due to the constant handling and moving of products, among other risk factors. The incidence of STF injuries is higher among retail employees than among all workers in the private sector. Grocery stores and enterprises that handle meat employees are particularly in danger, with a rate that is 75% higher than the industry average for all other private industries combined. The following dangers have led to workplace slips, trips, and same-level falls: Spills on the walking surface, ice, rain, and snow can create outdoor slipping hazards, loose rugs and mats, boxes and containers, poor lighting visibility and walking surfaces that are disrepairs, have protruding nails and boards change in floor heights may cause STFS.
On slippery and wet terrain, the risk of slipping and falling can be decreased by wearing footwear with high slip resistance. Falls on slippery and damp surfaces can result in severe, potentially fatal injuries, especially for elderly people. Here, we demonstrate how rubber outsoles for shoes that contain salt chloride or activated carbon increase friction and decrease walking slippage. We have determined that during contact between the rubber and the surface, small depressions filled with salt chloride or activated carbon were produced on outsole materials, which allowed some air to enter the interface. Although air bubbles exist between the rubber and the surface, genuine contacts are encased in water that has a negative pressure (Laplace pressure). It is believed that the negative pressure encourages the establishment of genuine contact, which results in significant friction. We believe that materials for outsoles that contain sodium chloride or activated carbon can lessen the likelihood of slip-and-fall incidents.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
Although air bubbles exist between the rubber and the surface, genuine contacts are encased in water that has a negative pressure (Laplace pressure). It is believed that the negative pressure encourages the establishment of genuine contact, which results in significant friction. We believe that materials for outsoles that contain sodium chloride or activated carbon can lessen the likelihood of slip-and-fall incidents. Although you have insurance in place to safeguard your company's money in the future, you should always put the safety of your staff and clients first. Having your staff wear skid-resistant footwear while at work can significantly lower the risk of a slip and fall injury. High-heeled footwear or footwear with non-rubber soles might be hazardous. For everyone's safety, make sure to wear cozy shoes with rubber soles.
Due to the expansion in restaurants, USA demand for slip-resistant shoes would accelerate the growth of the shoe market.
Due to rising outdoor dining habits, the restaurant industry will hire more people, which will increase demand for the goods. The item is frequently used in the food service and restaurant industries to stop slippage because of water and oil spills on the floor. The expansion of the USA market for slip-resistant shoes will be a positive impact on the growing knowledge of how to prevent accidents in kitchens and restaurants. To produce excellent products and increase production effectiveness, manufacturers are investing heavily in new product launches and technical improvements. One of the key goals at fine dining establishments is the safety of the staff. Due to this, both employers and employees are now requesting high-traction, slip-resistant footwear. It will have a big impact on slip-resistant shoe sales in upscale eateries. The expansion of upscale dining outside and in outdoor settings is credited with driving industry growth.
Due to the constant use of water and oil while cooking meals, kitchen area flooring is typically slippery. To avoid mishaps, workers in the kitchen and food preparation facilities should wear slip-resistant footwear.
For instance, Clement Design added ADHERA to their product line-up in May 2018. The highest coefficient of adhesion ever recorded on the market has been achieved by it thus far. This has aided the business in diversifying its product offering. One of the best-gripping shoes in the world is ADHERA. According to tests conducted at the CTC (Technical Centre for Leather) in line with the European SRB standard, the grip coefficient achieved for this sole when tested on a steel surface covered in glycerine is 50% higher than that of rival products.
Mallcom India Launch its safety shoes for the hospitality sector.
With the release of the stylish lifestyle safety shoes Freddie, Mallcom India Limited, the nation’s first manufacturer of whole-body Personal Protection Equipment, has entered a new market. While the Central Government's initiatives on Worker's Health and Safety have assisted in the best acceptance of safety products and PPEs, the Company's Lifestyle Safety Shoe Range has set a benchmark for unparalleled quality that is designed to perform exceptionally well in almost every Work Environment but in Style.
The line's objective is to become a reputable manufacturer of high-end PPE items to shield workers from any potentially hazardous working conditions. To reduce the risk of slip or fall incidents, this shoe is especially useful for working in busy restaurant kitchens and food manufacturing facilities. It is the ideal solution for waiters, bartenders, janitors, chefs, grocery store clerks, and other workers who frequently work in hazardous floor conditions because of its anti-slip, breathable, puncture- and abrasion-resistant, brilliant color scheme, and aesthetics. The production of high-quality, secure, and slip-resistant footwear is essential in environments that are slippery, from grease and oil to soap, water, and chemicals.
It is vital to adopt modern technology and use them to innovate products without sacrificing the utility element. According to EN and BIS standards, our new line of safety shoes has undergone testing and certification.
Rubber Sole is the most popular Sole type in Slip Resistant Shoes Market
Shoes that are specifically made to prevent slipping in slick and wet circumstances are known as non-slip shoes. When walking on slick areas, these shoes' unique rubber outsoles offer a stronger grip. Non-slip footwear is extremely adaptable and useful in a variety of settings. These shoes provide peace of mind by greatly lowering the likelihood of trips, falls, and slips while keeping you secure and guarded against various injuries.
Synthetic materials are commonly used in the Slip Resistant Shoes Market.
The demand for synthetic materials is rising because of their similar appearance and feel to genuine leather without the ethical issues related to animal rights. These materials offer a better value proposition for producers because they are more affordable, long-lasting, and environmentally friendly than leather. Demand for synthetic materials is increasing as businesses strive to leave no carbon imprint.
Commonly, Men prefer Slip Resistant Shoes Market to women.
Men's slip-resistant shoes are widely available. Men choose to wear shoes more regularly since they engage in a variety of physical activities on a daily basis, but there are Slip Resistant Shoes Markets for women and kids as well. Shoes help with comfort and safety to some extent.
There is a number of brands that are providing special Slip Resistant Shoes for heavy physical activities and are suitable for workplaces as well. Many designer and luxury brands are also making Slip Resistant Shoes Market with unique designs, for exclusive prices. Manufacturers are investing heavily in the development of new products and technological breakthroughs in order to deliver high-quality goods and increase production effectiveness Chemical additions can change synthetic materials and make them waterproof.
For Instance:
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
Historical Data Available for | 2017 to 2022 |
Market Analysis | USD Billion for Value |
Key Regions Covered | North America; Latin America; Europe; East Asia; South Asia; Oceania & Middle East and Africa(MEA) |
Key Countries Covered | USA, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Northern Africa GCC Countries, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia & New Zealand. |
Key Segments Covered | Sole Type, Material Type, Consumer Orientation, Sales Channel, and Region. |
Key Companies Profiled | Crocs Inc.; KEEN, INC.; Shoes For Crews, LLC; Birkenstock Digital GmbH; Clement Design USA; Fila; Skechers USA, Inc.; Docker Shoes; Caleres, Inc.; NANOTECH CERAMICS CO., LTD.; Bravo Shoes; Others |
Report Coverage | Market Forecast, Company Share Analysis, Competition Intelligence, Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities and Threats Analysis, Market Dynamics and Challenges, and Strategic Growth Initiatives |
Customization & Pricing | Available upon Request |
The slip resistant shoes market is set to be worth US$ 1.49 billion in 2023.
The slip resistant shoes market is evolving at a 6% CAGR through 2033.
The slip resistant shoes market is expected to be worth US$ 2.67 billion by 2033.
The synthetics segment is the leading material type in the slip resistant shoes market.
India may gain prominent growth in the slip resistant shoes market.
1. Executive Summary | Slip Resistant Shoes Market
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Summary of Key Findings
1.3. Summary of Key Statistics
1.4. FMI Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition
3. Key Market Trends
3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Market
3.1.1. Millennials are Driving Force
3.1.2. Rapid Emergence of The Start-ups In the Market
3.1.3. Increasing Awareness about sustainability
3.1.4. Globalization Impacting Lifestyles
3.1.5. Consumers Selecting for At-home Services, Using e-Commerce
3.1.6. Others
3.2. Product Innovation Trends
3.2.1. Manufacturers Increasingly Spending on R&D and Stepping Up Eco-friendly material
3.2.2. Growing Consumer Interest in Multifunctional Products
3.2.3. Prominent Players are Now Diversifying Into other Profitable Segments
3.2.4. Evolution in Product Design
3.3. Future Prospects of the Leather Sneakers Industry
3.3.1. Factors Fuelling Growth
3.3.2. Influx of Brands
3.3.3. Innovative Distribution & Marketing Strategies
4. Market Demand Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast, 2022 to 2032
4.1. Historical Market Volume (Units) Analysis, 2017 to 2021
4.2. Current and Future Market Volume (Units) Projections, 2022 to 2032
4.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
5. Market - Pricing Analysis
5.1. Regional Pricing Analysis By Product Type
5.2. Pricing Break-up
5.2.1. Manufacturer-Level Pricing
5.2.2. Distributor Level Pricing
5.3. Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark
6. Market Demand (in Value or in US$ Million) Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast, 2022 to 2032
6.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Million) Analysis, 2017 to 2021
6.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Million) Projections, 2022 to 2032
6.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
6.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
7. Market Background
7.1. Macro-Economic Factors
7.1.1. Global GDP Growth Outlook
7.1.2. Global Consumer Spending Outlook
7.1.3. Global Population and Income Level Growth Outlook
7.1.4. Global Apparel Industry Growth
7.1.5. GDP Growth Rate Analysis
7.1.6. Apparel Industry Contribution to GDP Outlook
7.1.7. Global E-Commerce Industry Outlook
7.1.8. Global Household Spending Outlook
7.1.9. Urbanization Growth Outlook
7.1.10. Global Male-Female Ratio Outlook
7.1.11. Per Capita Disposable Income
7.1.12. The outbreak of the Covid-19 Pandemic
7.1.13. Economic Instability
7.1.14. Impact of Online Sales
7.2. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact
7.2.1. Top Companies Historical Growth
7.2.2. Global Leather Sneakers Industry Assessment
7.2.3. Global Retail Sales Outlook
7.2.4. Manufacturing Sector Gross Value Added
7.2.5. Urbanization Growth Outlook
7.2.6. Consumer Price Index
7.2.7. Others
7.3. Purchase Pattern Assessment
7.3.1. Analysis Of Perception Towards Leather Sneakers
7.3.2. Analysis Of Preferred Purchase Mode
7.3.3. Analysis On The Consumption Pattern
7.3.4. Consumer Insights
7.3.5. Others (Pointers Will Be Developed During The Course of Study)
7.4. Industry Value and Supply Chain Analysis
7.5. Market Dynamics
7.5.1. Drivers
7.5.2. Restraints
7.5.3. Opportunity Analysis
7.6. PESTLE Analysis of Market
7.7. Investment Feasibility Matrix
7.8. Porter’s Five Force
8. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Sole Type
8.1. Introduction / Key Findings
8.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Sole Type, 2017 to 2021
8.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Sole Type, 2022 to 2032
8.3.1. Rubber
8.3.2. Synthetic
8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Sole Type
9. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Material Type
9.1. Introduction / Key Findings
9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Material Type, 2017 to 2021
9.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Material Type, 2022 to 2032
9.3.1. Leather
9.3.2. Synthetic
9.3.3. Others
9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material Type
10. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Consumer Orientation
10.1. Introduction / Key Findings
10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Consumer Orientation, 2017 to 2021
10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Consumer Orientation, 2022 to 2032
10.3.1. Men
10.3.2. Women
10.3.3. Kids
10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Consumer Orientation
11. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Sales Channel
11.1. Introduction / Key Findings
11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Sales Channel, 2017 to 2021
11.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Sales Channel, 2022 to 2032
11.3.1. Multi-brand Stores
11.3.2. Independent Small Stores
11.3.3. Online Retailers
11.3.4. Other Sales Channel
11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Sales Channel
12. Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, by Region
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis By Region, 2017 to 2021
12.3. Current Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2022 to 2032
12.3.1. North America
12.3.2. Latin America
12.3.3. Europe
12.3.4. East Asia
12.3.5. South Asia
12.3.6. Oceania
12.3.7. Middle East and Africa(MEA)
12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
13. North America Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
13.1. Introduction
13.2. Pricing Analysis
13.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
13.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
13.4.1. By Country
13.4.1.1. USA
13.4.1.2. Canada
13.4.2. By Sole Type
13.4.3. By Material Type
13.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
13.4.5. By Sales Channel
13.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.5.1. By Country
13.5.2. By Sole Type
13.5.3. By Material Type
13.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
13.5.5. By Sales Channel
14. Latin America Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
14.1. Introduction
14.2. Pricing Analysis
14.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
14.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
14.4.1. By Country
14.4.1.1. Brazil
14.4.1.2. Mexico
14.4.1.3. Rest of Latin America
14.4.2. By Sole Type
14.4.3. By Material Type
14.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
14.4.5. By Sales Channel
14.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
14.5.1. By Country
14.5.2. By Sole Type
14.5.3. By Material Type
14.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
14.5.5. By Sales Channel
15. Europe Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
15.1. Introduction
15.2. Pricing Analysis
15.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
15.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
15.4.1. By Country
15.4.1.1. United Kingdom
15.4.1.2. Germany
15.4.1.3. Italy
15.4.1.4. Spain
15.4.1.5. France
15.4.1.6. Russia
15.4.1.7. Rest of Europe
15.4.2. By Sole Type
15.4.3. By Material Type
15.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
15.4.5. By Sales Channel
15.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
15.5.1. By Country
15.5.2. By Sole Type
15.5.3. By Material Type
15.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
15.5.5. By Sales Channel
16. East Asia Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
16.1. Introduction
16.2. Pricing Analysis
16.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
16.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
16.4.1. By Country
16.4.1.1. China
16.4.1.2. Japan
16.4.1.3. South Korea
16.4.2. By Sole Type
16.4.3. By Material Type
16.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
16.4.5. By Sales Channel
16.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
16.5.1. By Country
16.5.2. By Sole Type
16.5.3. By Material Type
16.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
16.5.5. By Sales Channel
17. South Asia Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
17.1. Introduction
17.2. Pricing Analysis
17.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
17.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
17.4.1. By Country
17.4.1.1. India
17.4.1.2. Thailand
17.4.1.3. Malaysia
17.4.1.4. Indonesia
17.4.1.5. Rest of South Asia
17.4.2. By Sole Type
17.4.3. By Material Type
17.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
17.4.5. By Sales Channel
17.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
17.5.1. By Country
17.5.2. By Sole Type
17.5.3. By Material Type
17.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
17.5.5. By Sales Channel
18. Oceania Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
18.1. Introduction
18.2. Pricing Analysis
18.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
18.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
18.4.1. By Country
18.4.1.1. Australia
18.4.1.2. New Zealand
18.4.2. By Sole Type
18.4.3. By Material Type
18.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
18.4.5. By Sales Channel
18.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
18.5.1. By Country
18.5.2. By Sole Type
18.5.3. By Material Type
18.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
18.5.5. By Sales Channel
19. MEA Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032
19.1. Introduction
19.2. Pricing Analysis
19.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021
19.4. Market Size (US$ Million) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032
19.4.1. By Country
19.4.1.1. GCC Countries
19.4.1.2. South Africa
19.4.1.3. Rest of Middle East and Africa(MEA)
19.4.2. By Sole Type
19.4.3. By Material Type
19.4.4. By Consumer Orientation
19.4.5. By Sales Channel
19.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
19.5.1. By Country
19.5.2. By Sole Type
19.5.3. By Material Type
19.5.4. By Consumer Orientation
19.5.5. By Sales Channel
20. Key Countries Market Analysis
20.1. Introduction
20.1.1. Market Value Proportion Analysis, By Key Countries
20.1.2. Global Vs. Country Growth Comparison
20.2. USA Market Analysis
20.2.1. By Sole Type
20.2.2. By Material Type
20.2.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.2.4. By Sales Channel
20.3. Canada Market Analysis
20.3.1. By Sole Type
20.3.2. By Material Type
20.3.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.3.4. By Sales Channel
20.4. Mexico Market Analysis
20.4.1. By Sole Type
20.4.2. By Material Type
20.4.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.4.4. By Sales Channel
20.5. Brazil Market Analysis
20.5.1. By Sole Type
20.5.2. By Material Type
20.5.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.5.4. By Sales Channel
20.6. Germany Market Analysis
20.6.1. By Sole Type
20.6.2. By Material Type
20.6.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.6.4. By Sales Channel
20.7. Italy Market Analysis
20.7.1. By Sole Type
20.7.2. By Material Type
20.7.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.7.4. By Sales Channel
20.8. France Market Analysis
20.8.1. By Sole Type
20.8.2. By Material Type
20.8.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.8.4. By Sales Channel
20.9. United Kingdom Market Analysis
20.9.1. By Sole Type
20.9.2. By Material Type
20.9.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.9.4. By Sales Channel
20.10. Spain Market Analysis
20.10.1. By Sole Type
20.10.2. By Material Type
20.10.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.10.4. By Sales Channel
20.11. Russia Market Analysis
20.11.1. By Sole Type
20.11.2. By Material Type
20.11.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.11.4. By Sales Channel
20.12. China Market Analysis
20.12.1. By Sole Type
20.12.2. By Material Type
20.12.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.12.4. By Sales Channel
20.13. Japan Market Analysis
20.13.1. By Sole Type
20.13.2. By Material Type
20.13.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.13.4. By Sales Channel
20.14. South Korea Market Analysis
20.14.1. By Sole Type
20.14.2. By Material Type
20.14.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.14.4. By Sales Channel
20.15. India Market Analysis
20.15.1. By Sole Type
20.15.2. By Material Type
20.15.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.15.4. By Sales Channel
20.16. ASEAN Market Analysis
20.16.1. By Sole Type
20.16.2. By Material Type
20.16.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.16.4. By Sales Channel
20.17. Australia and New Zealand Market Analysis
20.17.1. By Sole Type
20.17.2. By Material Type
20.17.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.17.4. By Sales Channel
20.18. Turkey Market Analysis
20.18.1. By Sole Type
20.18.2. By Material Type
20.18.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.18.4. By Sales Channel
20.19. South Africa Market Analysis
20.19.1. By Sole Type
20.19.2. By Material Type
20.19.3. By Consumer Orientation
20.19.4. By Sales Channel
21. Market Structure Analysis
21.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies
21.2. Market Concentration
21.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
21.4. Market Presence Analysis
21.4.1. By Regional footprint of Players
21.4.2. Product foot print by Players
21.4.3. Channel Foot Print by Players
22. Competition Analysis
22.1. Competition Dashboard
22.2. Pricing Analysis by Competition
22.3. Competition Benchmarking
22.4. Competition Deep Dive
22.4.1. Crocs INC.,
22.4.1.1. Overview
22.4.1.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.1.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.1.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.2. KEEN, INC.
22.4.2.1. Overview
22.4.2.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.2.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.2.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.3. Shoes For Crews, LLC
22.4.3.1. Overview
22.4.3.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.3.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.3.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.4. Birkenstock Digital GmbH
22.4.4.1. Overview
22.4.4.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.4.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.4.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.5. Clement Design USA
22.4.5.1. Overview
22.4.5.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.5.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.5.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.6. Fila
22.4.6.1. Overview
22.4.6.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.6.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.6.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.7. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
22.4.7.1. Overview
22.4.7.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.7.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.7.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.8. Docker Shoes
22.4.8.1. Overview
22.4.8.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.8.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.8.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.9. Caleres, Inc.
22.4.9.1. Overview
22.4.9.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.9.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.9.5. Strategy Overview
22.4.10. Others (As per Request)
22.4.10.1. Overview
22.4.10.2. Product Portfolio
22.4.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
22.4.10.4. Distribution Footprint
22.4.10.5. Strategy Overview
23. Assumptions and Acronyms Used
24. Research Methodology
Explore Consumer Product Insights
View Reports