The global silo bags market size is expected to surge at a CAGR of 6.6% in the forecast period from 2023 to 2033. The market value is projected to increase from US$ 938.3 million in 2023 to US$ 1,783.5 million by 2033. The market was valued at US$ 872.0 million at the end of 2022, and is anticipated to exhibit y-o-y growth of 7.6% in 2023.
The silo bags industry is projected to witness significant growth in the estimated time frame. According to recent forecasts, the market is expected to present a lucrative opportunity for incremental growth, with an estimated value of US$ 911.5 million by 2033. This growth is anticipated to be twice the current market value during the forecast period.
One of the primary drivers of high silo bag demand is growing need for efficient and cost-effective grain storage solutions in the agricultural sector. Silo bags offer farmers and grain producers a practical alternative to traditional storage methods. They allow them to preserve their produce effectively without the need for large, permanent structures such as traditional silos.
As the global population continues to rise, there is an increasing pressure on the agricultural sector to enhance productivity and reduce post-harvest losses. Hence, this factor is set to make silo bags an attractive choice for temporary storage.
Flexibility and versatility of silo bags might also contribute to their rising popularity. These bags can be used in various locations, providing farmers with the option to store their grains closer to the fields. They can also help in reducing transportation costs and improving logistics.
Ease of installation and mobility of silo bags might enable farmers to respond quickly to changing weather conditions or sudden increases in harvest volumes. This adaptability is expected to make them especially valuable in regions with unpredictable climates. They are also projected to be used in places where conventional storage infrastructure might be lacking.
Trend toward sustainable agricultural practices also plays a significant role in driving the demand for silo bags. These bags are often made from recyclable or biodegradable materials, aligning with increasing environmental consciousness among farmers and consumers.
As sustainable farming practices gain traction, adoption of eco-friendly grain storage solutions such as silo bags becomes an essential component. They are set to be used for reducing the environmental impact of agricultural operations.
Globalization of trade and increased market demand for grains might further contribute to rising interest in silo bags. With expansion of international grain trade, there is a need for reliable and efficient temporary storage solutions.
Silo bags provide a practical option for storing surplus grains. They might further allow farmers and grain traders to capitalize on favorable market conditions and meet fluctuating demands in different regions.
| Attributes | Key Insights |
|---|---|
| Silo Bags Market Estimated Size (2023E) | US$ 938.3 million |
| Projected Market Valuation (2033F) | US$ 1,783.5 million |
| Value-based CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 6.6% |
| Collective Value Share: Top 5 Companies (2022A) | 10% to 15% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
The silo bags market registered a CAGR of 5.1% during the historical period from 2017 to 2022. It reached a market value of US$ 872.0 million in 2022 from US$ 680.1 million in 2017.
Silo bags might offer a cost-effective and flexible grain storage solution. Farmers are drawn to these bags as they eliminate the need for expensive permanent silos, reducing capital investment and operational costs.
Silo bags can also be easily set up in various locations. They might enable farmers to store grains closer to the fields, optimizing logistics, and minimizing transportation expenses.
Scalability of silo bags is another appealing aspect for farmers. These bags come in various sizes and capacities, providing flexibility to store different quantities of grains based on individual harvest volumes. Farmers can easily adjust their storage needs, making silo bags a practical choice for handling varying yields from season to season.
Temporary nature of silo bags might address the need for short-term storage solutions during peak harvest periods. Farmers often face challenges in managing large volumes of freshly harvested grains.
Silo bags provide a convenient and efficient way to store the surplus until it can be transported or sold at a later date. This is set to help prevent post-harvest losses and enable farmers to capitalize on favorable market conditions.
Another crucial factor contributing to the rising demand for silo bags is their portability. Unlike traditional silos, which are fixed structures, silo bags can be easily moved to different locations on the farm. This mobility would allow farmers to store grains closer to the fields, reducing the time and cost of transportation.
Ability to relocate the bags based on changing weather conditions or logistical requirements might provide a practical advantage. It is expected to be mainly beneficial in regions with unpredictable climates.
Automated filling and emptying systems are influencing the silo bags industry share in a number of ways.
Principal Consultant
Silo bags are a popular option for storing fertilizer as they are durable, easy to transport, and relatively inexpensive. Additionally, they can be used to store fertilizer in a variety of climates, making them a versatile option for farmers and other businesses.
Use of fertilizer is increasing in various parts of the world, as farmers look to improve crop yields. Silo bags are a convenient and cost-effective way to store fertilizer. They are becoming increasingly popular among farmers and fertilizer distributors.
Growing demand for fertilizer has been a positive force for the market for silo bags. As demand for fertilizer continues to expand, the global silo bags industry is expected to elevate.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
| Country | United States |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 79.2% |
| Market Share (2033) | 75.4% |
| BPS Analysis | -300 |
| Country | Canada |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 20.8% |
| Market Share (2033) | 24.6% |
| BPS Analysis | 50 |
| Country | Brazil |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 38.2% |
| Market Share (2033) | 34.8% |
| BPS Analysis | -530 |
| Country | China |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 47.2% |
| Market Share (2033) | 45.4% |
| BPS Analysis | 110 |
| Country | Germany |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 22.5% |
| Market Share (2033) | 20.4% |
| BPS Analysis | -70 |
| Country | France |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 16.3% |
| Market Share (2033) | 15.9% |
| BPS Analysis | -40 |
| Country | United Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Market Share (2023) | 18.6% |
| Market Share (2033) | 17.5% |
| BPS Analysis | -60 |
Silo Bags for Grain Storage to Witness High Demand amid Adoption of New Farming Methods in the United States
The United States silo bags market is anticipated to offer an incremental opportunity of US$ 167.8 million in the evaluation period. The country’s agricultural sector might have seen a rise in the adoption of temporary grain storage solutions such as silo bags.
It is due to their cost-effectiveness and flexibility. This trend could create a growing demand for silo bags vendors in the country.
Government policies or incentives aimed at promoting modern agricultural practices and improving food security might have encouraged the use of efficient and sustainable grain storage methods such as silo bags. These policies can create a favorable environment for silo bags vendors.
With an increasing focus on sustainable agricultural practices and eco-friendly solutions, demand for environmentally friendly silo bags could have been on the rise in the United States. It is expected to present lucrative opportunities for vendors offering such products.
The United States is a significant exporter of agricultural products. Use of silo bags for temporary storage could have helped farmers and exporters manage surpluses more efficiently.
They can help in ensuring the quality and quantity of grains during transportation and storage. This, in turn, might have increased the demand for silo bags from vendors catering to export-focused clients.
Grain Storage Bags to Become Popular in China with Need to Prevent Post-harvest Losses
China silo bags industry is estimated to provide an incremental opportunity of US$ 64.3 million by 2033. China's agricultural sector is substantial, and it plays a crucial role in feeding its vast population and supporting its economy. With increasing agricultural production and need to store larger quantities of grains, there has been a rising demand for efficient storage solutions such as silo bags.
In a few parts of China, there might be limited access to traditional storage infrastructure such as permanent silos. Silo bags might provide a practical and accessible alternative for temporary grain storage, especially in areas where constructing permanent structures is not feasible or cost-effective.
China has a massive population, and as it continues to surge, demand for food products also increases. To ensure food security and minimize post-harvest losses, farmers and grain producers have been seeking reliable and temporary storage solutions such as silo bags.
China is also a key exporter of agricultural products. Silo bags enable efficient storage and handling of grains during transportation and export. They might help in ensuring the quality of produce and meeting international market demands.
LLDPE Silo Bags for Grain & Forage Storage to Gain Momentum Worldwide
The linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) segment is expected to surge with a CAGR of 6.8% in the forecast period. It is likely to create an incremental opportunity of US$ 164 million in the same time frame.
LLDPE is known for its excellent strength and durability, making it ideal for withstanding the rigors of outdoor storage. It also helps in protecting grains from external factors such as moisture, pests, and UV radiation. Robust nature of LLDPE ensures that the silo bags can effectively preserve the quality of stored grains over extended periods.
LLDPE has a high level of flexibility, allowing the silo bags to conform to the shape of the stored grain. This flexibility helps minimize air gaps within the bag, reducing the risk of spoilage and maintaining an optimal storage environment. LLDPE's puncture resistance might also prevent damage to these bags during handling and transportation, ensuring integrity of the stored grains.
LLDPE is a relatively cost-effective material, making silo bags made of LLDPE a more affordable storage option compared to permanent storage structures. This cost-effectiveness might appeal to farmers and grain producers looking for economical solutions for temporary grain storage.
Three-layer Silo Bag Storage to Find Extensive Usage across the Globe
The 3 layer segment is expected to hold around 48.6% of the silo bags market share in 2033. Three-layer silo bags might have a slightly higher upfront cost compared to single-layer or two-layer bags.
Their enhanced protection and extended shelf life can result in long-term cost savings. Reduced spoilage and minimal losses due to improved storage conditions can outweigh the initial investment.
Three-layer silo bags are versatile and suitable for a wide range of crops & storage conditions. Whether storing grains, seeds, or other agricultural products, the multilayer design offers flexibility in adapting to different storage needs and requirements.
Three-layer construction provides an extra layer of protection for the stored grains. Each layer serves a specific purpose. The outer layer offers UV protection, the middle layer provides strength & puncture resistance, and the inner layer safeguards the grains from moisture. This multilayer design would help ensure superior protection against spoilage and quality degradation during storage.
Silo bag manufacturers might focus on producing bags with high-quality materials and improved durability to ensure the safe storage of grains over extended periods. Offering a range of bag sizes and capacities allows manufacturers to cater to the diverse needs of farmers and grain producers.
Implementing UV protection and specialized coatings on the bags can increase their longevity and protect the stored grains from external factors. Manufacturers might invest in research & development to improve bag design, materials, and production processes, making the bags more efficient and user-friendly.
In response to growing environmental concerns, a few manufacturers might have focused on developing biodegradable silo bags or those made from eco-friendly materials. Integration of technology such as sensors and monitoring systems into these bags might enable real-time monitoring of grain conditions and reduce the risk of spoilage.
For instance,
| Attributes | Details |
|---|---|
| Estimated Market Size (2023) | US$ 938.3 million |
| Projected Market Valuation (2033) | US$ 1,783.5 million |
| Value-based CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 6.6% |
| Historical Data | 2017 to 2022 |
| Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
| Quantitative Units | Value (US$ million) |
| Segments Covered | Material, Capacity, Layer, Application, Region |
| Key Regions Covered | North America; Latin America; East Asia; South Asia & Pacific; Western Europe; Eastern Europe; Central Asia; Russia & Belarus; Balkan & Baltic Countries; Middle East & Africa |
| Key Countries Covered | United States, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Italy, France, United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, GCC Countries, China, India, Australia |
| Key Companies Profiled | Berry Global Inc.; IG Industrial Plastics, LLC; Canadian Tarpaulin Manufacturers Ltd.; Poly-Ag Corp.; Pacifil Brasil; Agroflex; Planet Plastic LLC; ARGSELMASH; Up North Plastics, Inc.; Seed & Forage Bags Australia Pty Ltd.; Polypropylene Products and Polypropylene Bags; Shanghai HiTeC Plastics Co., Ltd.; Shandong Longxing Plastic Film Technology Corp. Ltd.; Rishi FIBC Solutions Pvt. Ltd; IPESA USA LLC; RKW Group; PLASTAR; GEM Silage Products; Blue lake Plastics, LLC |
| Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Volume Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, Trends and Pricing Analysis |
The market is valued at US$ 938.3 million in 2023.
Berry Global Inc., and IG Industrial Plastics, LLC are key market players.
The market is forecast to register a CAGR of 6.6% through 2033.
From 2017 to 2022, the market registered a CAGR of 5.1%.
Rising demand for eco-friendly materials is encouraging the sales.
1. Executive Summary
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Market Analysis
1.3. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Key Market Trends
3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Market
3.2. Sustainable Trends
3.3. Technological Trends
3.4. Product Innovation / Development Trends
4. Key Success Factors
4.1. Product Adoption / Usage Analysis
4.2. Product USPs / Features
4.3. Strategic Promotional Strategies
4.4. Go-to-market Strategies
5. PESTLE and Porter 5 Force Analysis
6. Global Market Demand Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033
6.1. Historical Market Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis, 2017 to 2022
6.2. Current and Future Market Volume (‘000 Units) Projections, 2023 to 2033
6.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
7. Global Market - Pricing Analysis
7.1. Average Selling Price, By Material (US$/Ton)
7.2. Regional Pricing Analysis
7.3. Global Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark
8. Global Market Demand (in Value or Size in US$ million) Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033
8.1. Historical Market Value (US$ million) Analysis, 2017 to 2022
8.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ million) Projections, 2023 to 2033
8.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
8.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
9. Market Background
9.1. Global Packaging Market Overview
9.2. Global Bulk Packaging Market Overview
9.3. Global Agricultural Packaging Market Overview
9.4. Comparative Study for In-house Packaging Vs. Contract Packaging
9.5. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact
9.6. Value Chain
9.6.1. Exhaustive List of Raw Material Suppliers
9.6.2. Exhaustive List of Manufacturers/ Converters/Distributors
9.6.3. Exhaustive List of Brand Owners/ Customer Base
9.7. Case-based Scenario – Impact Assessment
9.7.1. Current Statistics
9.7.2. Short-Mid-Long Term Outlook
9.7.3. Likely Rebound
9.8. Market Dynamics
9.8.1. Drivers
9.8.2. Restraints
9.8.3. Opportunity Analysis
9.9. Supply Demand Analysis
9.9.1. Import /Export Analysis
10. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Material
10.1. Introduction / Key Findings
10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis By Material , 2017 to 2022
10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast By Material, 2023 to 2033
10.3.1. Low-density Polyethylene (LDPE)
10.3.2. Linear Low-density Polyethylene (LLDPE)
10.3.3. Others (High-density Polyethylene (HDPE), Polypropylene (PP))
10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material
11. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Capacity
11.1. Introduction / Key Findings
11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis By Capacity, 2017 to 2022
11.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast By Capacity, 2023 to 2033
11.3.1. Less than 100 Tons
11.3.2. 100 to 200 Tons
11.3.3. 201 to 250 Tons
11.3.4. Above 250 Tons
11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Capacity
12. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Layer
12.1. Introduction / Key Findings
12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis By Layer, 2017 to 2022
12.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast By Layer, 2023 to 2033
12.3.1. 3 Layer
12.3.2. 5 Layer
12.3.3. 7 Layer
12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Layer
13. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Application
13.1. Introduction / Key Findings
13.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis By Application, 2017 to 2022
13.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast By Application, 2023 to 2033
13.3.1. Cereals
13.3.2. Pulses
13.3.3. Legumes
13.3.4. Oilseeds
13.3.5. Cottonseed
13.3.6. Fertilizers
13.3.7. Coal
13.3.8. Cement
13.3.9. Woodchip
13.3.10. Fodder
13.3.11. Other Grain Products
13.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application
14. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Region
14.1. Introduction / Key Findings
14.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis By Region, 2017 to 2022
14.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2023 to 2033
14.3.1. North America
14.3.2. Latin America
14.3.3. East Asia
14.3.4. South Asia & Pacific
14.3.5. Western Europe
14.3.6. Eastern Europe
14.3.7. Central Asia
14.3.8. Russia & Belarus
14.3.9. Balkan & Baltic Countries
14.3.10. Middle East and Africa
14.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
15. North America Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
15.1. Introduction / Key Findings
15.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
15.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
15.3.1. By Country
15.3.1.1. United States
15.3.1.2. Canada
15.3.2. By Material
15.3.3. By Capacity
15.3.4. By Layer
15.3.5. By Application
15.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
15.4.1. By Country
15.4.2. By Material
15.4.3. By Capacity
15.4.4. By Layer
15.4.5. By Application
15.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
16. Latin America Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
16.1. Introduction / Key Findings
16.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
16.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
16.3.1. By Country
16.3.1.1. Brazil
16.3.1.2. Mexico
16.3.1.3. Argentina
16.3.1.4. Rest of Latin America
16.3.2. By Material
16.3.3. By Capacity
16.3.4. By Layer
16.3.5. By Application
16.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
16.4.1. By Country
16.4.2. By Material
16.4.3. By Capacity
16.4.4. By Layer
16.4.5. By Application
16.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
17. East Asia Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
17.1. Introduction / Key Findings
17.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
17.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
17.3.1. By Country
17.3.1.1. China
17.3.1.2. Japan
17.3.1.3. South Korea
17.3.2. By Material
17.3.3. By Capacity
17.3.4. By Layer
17.3.5. By Application
17.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
17.4.1. By Country
17.4.2. By Material
17.4.3. By Capacity
17.4.4. By Layer
17.4.5. By Application
17.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
18. South Asia & Pacific Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
18.1. Introduction / Key Findings
18.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
18.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
18.3.1. By Country
18.3.1.1. India
18.3.1.2. Association of Southeast Asian Nations
18.3.1.3. Australia & New Zealand
18.3.2. By Material
18.3.3. By Capacity
18.3.4. By Layer
18.3.5. By Application
18.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
18.4.1. By Country
18.4.2. By Material
18.4.3. By Capacity
18.4.4. By Layer
18.4.5. By Application
18.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
19. Western Europe Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
19.1. Introduction / Key Findings
19.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
19.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
19.3.1. By Country
19.3.1.1. Germany
19.3.1.2. France
19.3.1.3. Spain
19.3.1.4. Italy
19.3.1.5. United Kingdom
19.3.1.6. BENELUX
19.3.1.7. Nordics
19.3.1.8. Rest of Western Europe
19.3.2. By Material
19.3.3. By Capacity
19.3.4. By Layer
19.3.5. By Application
19.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
19.4.1. By Country
19.4.2. By Material
19.4.3. By Capacity
19.4.4. By Layer
19.4.5. By Application
19.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
20. Eastern Europe Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
20.1. Introduction / Key Findings
20.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
20.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
20.3.1. By Country
20.3.1.1. Poland
20.3.1.2. Hungary
20.3.1.3. Romania
20.3.1.4. Czech Republic
20.3.1.5. Rest of Eastern Europe
20.3.2. By Material
20.3.3. By Capacity
20.3.4. By Layer
20.3.5. By Application
20.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
20.4.1. By Country
20.4.2. By Material
20.4.3. By Capacity
20.4.4. By Layer
20.4.5. By Application
20.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
21. Central Asia Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
21.1. Introduction / Key Findings
21.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
21.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
21.3.1. By Country
21.3.1.1. Kazakhstan
21.3.1.2. Kyrgyzstan
21.3.1.3. Tajikistan
21.3.1.4. Turkmenistan
21.3.1.5. Uzbekistan
21.3.2. By Material
21.3.3. By Capacity
21.3.4. By Layer
21.3.5. By Application
21.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
21.4.1. By Country
21.4.2. By Material
21.4.3. By Capacity
21.4.4. By Layer
21.4.5. By Application
21.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
22. Russia & Belarus Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
22.1. Introduction / Key Findings
22.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
22.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
22.3.1. By Country
22.3.1.1. Russia
22.3.1.2. Belarus
22.3.2. By Material
22.3.3. By Capacity
22.3.4. By Layer
22.3.5. By Application
22.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
22.4.1. By Country
22.4.2. By Material
22.4.3. By Capacity
22.4.4. By Layer
22.4.5. By Application
22.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
23. Balkan & Baltic Countries Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
23.1. Introduction / Key Findings
23.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
23.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
23.3.1. By Country
23.3.1.1. Romania
23.3.1.2. Greece
23.3.1.3. Bulgaria
23.3.1.4. Lithuania
23.3.1.5. Estonia
23.3.1.6. Latvia
23.3.2. By Material
23.3.3. By Capacity
23.3.4. By Layer
23.3.5. By Application
23.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
23.4.1. By Country
23.4.2. By Material
23.4.3. By Capacity
23.4.4. By Layer
23.4.5. By Application
23.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
24. Middle East & Africa Market Analysis 2017 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
24.1. Introduction / Key Findings
24.2. Historical Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis by Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2022
24.3. Current Market Size (US$ million) and Volume (‘000 Units) Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
24.3.1. By Country
24.3.1.1. GCC Countries
24.3.1.2. Türkiye
24.3.1.3. Northern Africa
24.3.1.4. South Africa
24.3.1.5. Israel
24.3.1.6. Saudi Arabia
24.3.2. By Material
24.3.3. By Capacity
24.3.4. By Layer
24.3.5. By Application
24.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
24.4.1. By Country
24.4.2. By Material
24.4.3. By Capacity
24.4.4. By Layer
24.4.5. By Application
24.5. Cross Section Analysis by Segments
25. Country wise Market Analysis 2023 & 2033
25.1. United States Market Analysis
25.1.1. By Material
25.1.2. By Capacity
25.1.3. By Layer
25.1.4. By Application
25.2. Canada Market Analysis
25.2.1. By Material
25.2.2. By Capacity
25.2.3. By Layer
25.2.4. By Application
25.3. Brazil Market Analysis
25.3.1. By Material
25.3.2. By Capacity
25.3.3. By Layer
25.3.4. By Application
25.4. Mexico Market Analysis
25.4.1. By Material
25.4.2. By Capacity
25.4.3. By Layer
25.4.4. By Application
25.5. Germany Market Analysis
25.5.1. By Material
25.5.2. By Capacity
25.5.3. By Layer
25.5.4. By Application
25.6. United Kingdom Market Analysis
25.6.1. By Material
25.6.2. By Capacity
25.6.3. By Layer
25.6.4. By Application
25.7. Spain Market Analysis
25.7.1. By Material
25.7.2. By Capacity
25.7.3. By Layer
25.7.4. By Application
25.8. France Market Analysis
25.8.1. By Material
25.8.2. By Capacity
25.8.3. By Layer
25.8.4. By Application
25.9. Russia Market Analysis
25.9.1. By Material
25.9.2. By Capacity
25.9.3. By Layer
25.9.4. By Application
25.10. China Market Analysis
25.10.1. By Material
25.10.2. By Capacity
25.10.3. By Layer
25.10.4. By Application
25.11. Japan Market Analysis
25.11.1. By Material
25.11.2. By Capacity
25.11.3. By Layer
25.11.4. By Application
25.12. India Market Analysis
25.12.1. By Material
25.12.2. By Capacity
25.12.3. By Layer
25.12.4. By Application
25.13. Brazil Market Analysis
25.13.1. By Material
25.13.2. By Capacity
25.13.3. By Layer
25.13.4. By Application
25.14. GCC Countries Market Analysis
25.14.1. By Material
25.14.2. By Capacity
25.14.3. By Layer
25.14.4. By Application
25.15. Australia Market Analysis
25.15.1. By Material
25.15.2. By Capacity
25.15.3. By Layer
25.15.4. By Application
26. Market Structure Analysis
26.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies (Silo Bags)
26.2. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
26.3. Market Presence Analysis
27. Competition Analysis
27.1. Competition Dashboard
27.2. Competition Benchmarking
27.3. Competition Deep Dive (Key Global Market Players)
27.3.1. Berry Global Group
27.3.1.1. Overview
27.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
27.3.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
27.3.1.4. Sales Footprint
27.3.1.5. Strategy Overview
27.3.2. IG Industrial Plastics, LLC
27.3.3. Canadian Tarpaulin Manufacturers LTD
27.3.4. Poly-Ag Corp.
27.3.5. Pacifil Brasil
27.3.6. Agroflex
27.3.7. Planet Plastic
27.3.8. ARGSELMASH
27.3.9. Up North Plastics, Inc.
27.3.10. Seed & Forage Bags Australia Pty Ltd.
27.3.11. Polypropylene Products and Polypropylene Bags
27.3.12. Shanghai HiTeC Plastics Co., Ltd
27.3.13. Shandong Longxing Plastic Film Technology Co., Ltd
27.3.14. Rishi FIBC Solutions Pvt. Ltd
28. Assumptions and Acronyms Used
29. Research Methodology
Explore Packaging Insights
View Reports
Silo bags Market
