The demand for marine fin stabilizer is expected to soar across Korea, especially in South Jeolla and North Jeolla. By the end of FY 2024, sales for marine fin stabilizer are poised to reach a valuation of US$ 50.8 million. The demand for marine fin stabilizer in Korea is likely to develop at a 3.9% CAGR from 2024 to 2034. The industry valuation is projected to attain US$ 74.08 million by 2034.
The Korea marine fin stabilizer industry is a dynamic sector within its maritime industry. With a focus on improving vessel stability, marine fin stabilizer plays a pivotal role in reducing rolling motion at sea. Korea, a leading hub for shipbuilding and marine technology, demonstrates prowess in manufacturing and innovating these stabilizing systems.
The industry showcases a strong commitment to enhancing the safety and comfort of seafaring vessels. Leveraging innovative technologies and rigorous quality standards, Korean manufacturers cater not only to domestic needs but also to the global demand for reliable and efficient marine fin stabilizer, contributing to the growth and sustainability of this vital maritime component.
Key Insight on Factors that Boost Sales of Marine Fin Stabilizer in Korea
| Attributes | Details |
|---|---|
| Anticipated Industry Size in 2024 | US$ 50.8 million |
| Expected Industry Size by 2034 | US$ 74.08 million |
| Forecasted CAGR between 2024 to 2034 | 3.9% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
The dominance of retractable stabilizers in the Korea marine fin stabilizer industry, projected to hold a substantial 65.3% industry share in 2024, can be attributed to their versatility and performance. Retractable stabilizers offer ship owners the flexibility to deploy or retract the fins, making them ideal for vessels of varying sizes and purposes. This adaptability not only ensures improved stability and reduced rolling motion at sea but also optimizes fuel efficiency.
| Product | Retractable |
|---|---|
| Industry Share in 2024 | 65.3% |
The efficient design minimizes drag when the stabilizers are not in use. These factors collectively make retractable stabilizers the preferred choice, aligning with the industry's pursuit of enhanced vessel performance, fuel savings, and improved passenger comfort, ultimately securing their dominant industry position.
The dominance of passenger vessels in the Korea marine fin stabilizer industry, anticipated to command a significant 76.1% industry share in 2024, stems from their unique operational demands. Passenger vessels, including cruise ships and ferries, prioritize passenger comfort and safety. Marine fin stabilizer is essential for reducing the rolling motion at sea, ensuring a smoother voyage.
| Vessel | Passenger |
|---|---|
| Industry Share in 2024 | 76.1% |
As passenger vessels continue to cater to the growing tourism and leisure industry, the demand for stabilizers that enhance the onboard experience has surged. With their critical role in elevating passenger satisfaction and safety, it is no surprise that passenger vessels lead the industry, reinforcing the importance of marine fin stabilizer in this segment.
Principal Consultant
North Jeolla is increasingly focusing on locally producing marine fin stabilizer. This trend aligns with global efforts to reduce supply chain complexities and enhance cost efficiency. The region is exploring innovative materials, including composites, to enhance the performance and durability of stabilizers. This trend demonstrates a commitment to technological advancements.
Environmental concerns are driving the development of eco-friendly stabilizers in North Jeolla, aligning with the global shift toward sustainability in maritime operations. The region is fostering partnerships between companies and research institutions, resulting in innovative stabilizer technology that caters to specific maritime requirements.
North Jeolla is also focusing on retrofitting existing vessels with stabilizer systems, offering cost-effective solutions for vessel owners looking to improve stability and performance.
The provision is investing in state-of-the-art testing facilities for marine fin stabilizer. This presents an opportunity for manufacturers to ensure the highest quality and performance, attracting customers with rigorous quality standards.
South Jeolla is exploring eco-friendly materials for stabilizer production, catering to the growing demand for sustainable shipping solutions and eco-conscious customers. The region is eyeing the creation of specialized vessels designed for diverse marine applications. This opens doors for developing tailored stabilizer systems that cater to unique vessel requirements.
South Jeolla is actively engaging in international partnerships and collaborations, broadening its presence in the global industry, and facilitating knowledge exchange and product development.
As the maritime industry looks to extend the life of existing vessels, South Jeolla sees an opportunity in retrofitting services, enhancing vessel stability and performance through stabilizer upgrades.
Few of the key players, including Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, Hyundai Heavy Industries, and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, characterize the competitive landscape of the Korea marine fin stabilizer industry. These companies, with their renowned shipbuilding expertise and innovative marine technology, dominate the industry. They emphasize high-quality stabilizer systems, customization, and adherence to international standards. While these industry giants lead, smaller manufacturers also play a significant role in niche industries. The competitive nature of the industry drives innovation, resulting in advanced, efficient, and environmentally friendly stabilizer solutions to meet the diverse demands of the maritime sector.
Product Portfolio of Marine Fin Stabilizer in Korea
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Estimated Industry Size in 2024 | US$ 50.8 million |
| Projected Industry Size by 2034 | US$ 74.08 million |
| Attributed CAGR between 2024 and 2034 | 3.9% |
| Historical Analysis of Demand for Marine Fin Stabilizer in Korea | 2019 to 2023 |
| Forecast Period | 2024 to 2034 |
| Report Coverage | Industry size, industry trends, analysis of key factors influencing the adoption ofMarine Fin Stabilizer in Korea, insights on global players and their industry strategy in Korea, ecosystem analysis of local and regional Korea providers. |
| Key Provinces Analyzed while Studying Opportunities for Marine Fin Stabilizer in Korea | South Gyeongsang, North Jeolla, South Jeolla, Jeju |
| Key Companies Profiled | Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction; Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.; Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd.; STX Offshore & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.; Wärtsilä Corporation; SEASTEMA; Simplex-Turbulo Co., Ltd. |
The sales of marine fin stabilizer are poised to reach US$ 50.8 million in 2024.
By 2034, the total value of the marine fin stabilizer ecosystem in Korea is likely to reach US$ 74.08 million.
From 2024 to 2034, the Korea marine fin stabilizer industry is likely to register a 3.9% CAGR.
The retractable segment is projected to lead in the industry in Korea.
1. Executive Summary
1.1. Market Outlook
1.2. Demand-side Trends
1.3. Supply-side Trends
1.4. Technology Roadmap Analysis
1.5. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Market Background
3.1. Market Dynamics
3.1.1. Drivers
3.1.2. Restraints
3.1.3. Opportunity
3.1.4. Trends
3.2. Scenario Forecast
3.2.1. Demand in Optimistic Scenario
3.2.2. Demand in Likely Scenario
3.2.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario
3.3. Opportunity Map Analysis
3.4. Product Life Cycle Analysis
3.5. Supply Chain Analysis
3.5.1. Supply Side Participants and their Roles
3.5.1.1. Producers
3.5.1.2. Mid-Level Participants (Traders/ Agents/ Brokers)
3.5.1.3. Wholesalers and Distributors
3.5.2. Value Added and Value Created at Node in the Supply Chain
3.5.3. List of Raw Material Suppliers
3.5.4. List of Existing and Potential Buyer’s
3.6. Investment Feasibility Matrix
3.7. Value Chain Analysis
3.7.1. Profit Margin Analysis
3.7.2. Wholesalers and Distributors
3.7.3. Retailers
3.8. PESTLE and Porter’s Analysis
3.9. Regulatory Landscape
3.9.1. By Key Regions
3.10. Regional Parent Market Outlook
3.11. Production and Consumption Statistics
3.12. Import and Export Statistics
4. Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033
4.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis, 2018 to 2022
4.2. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Projections, 2023 to 2033
4.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
4.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
5. Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Product Type
5.1. Introduction / Key Findings
5.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Product Type, 2018 to 2022
5.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Product Type, 2023 to 2033
5.3.1. Retractable
5.3.2. Non-retractable
5.3.3. Anchor Stabilizers
5.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Product Type, 2018 to 2022
5.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Product Type, 2023 to 2033
6. Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Vessel Type
6.1. Introduction / Key Findings
6.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Vessel Type, 2018 to 2022
6.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Vessel Type, 2023 to 2033
6.3.1. Passenger Vessels
6.3.1.1. Ferries
6.3.1.2. Cruise Ships
6.3.1.3. Yachts
6.3.2. Naval & Coast Guard Vessels
6.3.3. Fishing Vessels
6.3.4. Merchant Vessels
6.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Vessel Type, 2018 to 2022
6.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Vessel Type, 2023 to 2033
7. Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Fit Type
7.1. Introduction / Key Findings
7.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Fit Type, 2018 to 2022
7.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Fit Type, 2023 to 2033
7.3.1. First Fit
7.3.2. Retro Fit
7.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Fit Type, 2018 to 2022
7.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Fit Type, 2023 to 2033
8. Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Region
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Region, 2018 to 2022
8.3. Current Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2023 to 2033
8.3.1. South Gyeongsang
8.3.2. North Jeolla
8.3.3. South Jeolla
8.3.4. Jeju
8.3.5. Rest of
8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
9. South Gyeongsang Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
9.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
9.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
9.2.1. By Product Type
9.2.2. By Vessel Type
9.2.3. By Fit Type
9.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
9.3.1. By Product Type
9.3.2. By Vessel Type
9.3.3. By Fit Type
9.4. Key Takeaways
10. North Jeolla Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
10.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
10.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
10.2.1. By Product Type
10.2.2. By Vessel Type
10.2.3. By Fit Type
10.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
10.3.1. By Product Type
10.3.2. By Vessel Type
10.3.3. By Fit Type
10.4. Key Takeaways
11. South Jeolla Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
11.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
11.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
11.2.1. By Product Type
11.2.2. By Vessel Type
11.2.3. By Fit Type
11.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.3.1. By Product Type
11.3.2. By Vessel Type
11.3.3. By Fit Type
11.4. Key Takeaways
12. Jeju Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
12.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
12.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
12.2.1. By Product Type
12.2.2. By Vessel Type
12.2.3. By Fit Type
12.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.3.1. By Product Type
12.3.2. By Vessel Type
12.3.3. By Fit Type
12.4. Key Takeaways
13. Rest of Industry Analysis and Outlook 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033
13.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
13.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Units) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
13.2.1. By Product Type
13.2.2. By Vessel Type
13.2.3. By Fit Type
13.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.3.1. By Product Type
13.3.2. By Vessel Type
13.3.3. By Fit Type
13.4. Key Takeaways
14. Market Structure Analysis
14.1. Competition Dashboard
14.2. Competition Benchmarking
14.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
14.3.1. By Regional
14.3.2. By Product Type
14.3.3. By Vessel Type
14.3.4. By Fit Type
15. Competition Analysis
15.1. Competition Deep Dive
15.1.1. KROSYS
15.1.1.1. Overview
15.1.1.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.1.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.1.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.1.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.1.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.2. The NAIAD Dynamics
15.1.2.1. Overview
15.1.2.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.2.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.2.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.2.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.2.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.3. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
15.1.3.1. Overview
15.1.3.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.3.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.3.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.3.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.3.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.4. Quantum Marine Stabilizers
15.1.4.1. Overview
15.1.4.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.4.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.4.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.4.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.4.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.5. Matn’s Stabilizers
15.1.5.1. Overview
15.1.5.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.5.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.5.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.5.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.5.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.6. CMC Marine Srl
15.1.6.1. Overview
15.1.6.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.6.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.6.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.6.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.6.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.7. ABT TRAC
15.1.7.1. Overview
15.1.7.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.7.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.7.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.7.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.7.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.8. Rotorswing Marine
15.1.8.1. Overview
15.1.8.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.8.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.8.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.8.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.8.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.9. WTSV Technologies
15.1.9.1. Overview
15.1.9.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.9.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.9.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.9.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.9.5.3. Channel Strategy
15.1.10. Kongsberg Maritime (RRCM)
15.1.10.1. Overview
15.1.10.2. Product Portfolio
15.1.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments
15.1.10.4. Sales Footprint
15.1.10.5. Strategy Overview
15.1.10.5.1. Marketing Strategy
15.1.10.5.2. Product Strategy
15.1.10.5.3. Channel Strategy
16. Assumptions & Acronyms Used
17. Research Methodology
Explore Automotive Insights
View Reports
Marine Fin Stabilizer Industry Analysis in Korea
