The litigation funding investment market is a specialized type of third-party litigation financing of court cases, in which investors pay plaintiffs or legal firms in exchange for a share of either a settlement or an award. It’s growing as litigation financing draws individuals and companies into lawsuits without the upfront costs.
The market is driven by increasing acceptance of third-party funding, high-profile legal costs, increases in commercial disputes, and growth in other and supportive regulations in favour of third-party funding. Further, the expanded use of AI and analytics in case evaluation is improving risk assessment for investors.
In 2025, the global litigation funding investment market is projected to reach approximately USD 20,613.8 million, with expectations to grow to around USD 49,249.9 million by 2035, reflecting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 14.2% during the forecast period.
The estimated CAGR also shows the increasing utilization of litigation funding in corporate-related disputes, IP litigation, class actions, and international arbitration options. Future market expansion is also expected to be propelled by greater institutional investing and hedge fund involvement.
Key Market Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Size in 2025 | USD 20,613.8 Million |
| Projected Market Size in 2035 | USD 49,249.9 Million |
| CAGR (2025 to 2035) | 14.2% |
Explore FMI!
Book a free demo
Due to a legal system, increasing acceptance of third-party litigation finance, and a rise in corporate legal disputes contribute to North America comprising a significant share of the litigation funding investment market. The USA and Canada are the leaders in commercial litigation finance, class-action lawsuit financing, and mass tort claims. Market growth is also being driven by increased investments by private equity and hedge funds in legal financing.
Europe holds the largest market share with the UK, Germany, and France leading growth and institutional use of litigation finance due to regulation. Increased demand from collective redress (the UK equivalent of class actions) work, supported by the interest in the highly developed legal funding market in the UK, is contributing to demand. Increasing utilization of third-party financing in international commercial and arbitration cases is further enhancing the market growth in the region.
The litigation funding investment is expected to grow in the Asia-Pacific region most quickly, as legal disputes in China, Australia, India and Singapore increase in commercial, intellectual property and construction markets. Australia is one of the first economies to embrace litigation funding, while Singapore and Hong Kong are leading hubs for third-party funding of investment arbitration.
Insurance companies are taking up the offer, and corporate litigation finance is growing rapidly in Asia too, with rising legal costs and companies seeking alternative forms of financing.
Regulatory Uncertainty and High Litigation Risks
Different jurisdictions have adopted varying attitudes, ranging from acceptance to prohibition on third party litigation financing: This creates a challenge to the Investment Market of Litigation Funding. In other states, the regulations are stricter - or are outright state prohibitions against litigation funding - to guard against conflicts of interest and ethics issues. High litigation risks such as case uncertainty, long legal battles, and the potential for loss also deter investors from entering the market.
Growth in Legal Tech, AI-Powered Risk Assessment, and Expanding Jurisdictional Acceptance
Despite regulatory challenges, it is gaining ground internationally as legal costs increase and access to justice is broadening for cash-strapped litigants. Research is progressing in the areas of AI-based case analysis, predictive legal analytics analysis, and use of blockchain-based fund raising platforms to improve risk assessment, investment transparency, and litigation success rates.
In addition, acceptance of litigation funding continues to increase globally, particularly in developing economies, for commercial disputes, and in international arbitration, providing more opportunities for investment.
From 2020 to 2024, there was an increase in demand for litigation finance in commercial disputes, class actions, and intellectual property (IP) litigation, spurred by rising legal costs, corporate litigation, and favorable regulatory regimes in major jurisdictions (e.g. the UK, Australia, and parts of the USA). However, regulatory intolerance, ethical considerations and differing global acceptance provided roadblocks to growth.
Market for AI-based case evaluation, decentralized litigation funding platforms and greater jurisdictional growth is projected for the period of 2025 to 2035. Investment security and yield will benefit from the emergence of legal financing of ESG cases, mass torts, and risk mitigation tools utilizing AI. Blockchain for the starrization of the connex of funding agreements for smart contracts.
Market Shifts: A Comparative Analysis 2020 to 2024 vs. 2025 to 2035
| Market Shift | 2020 to 2024 Trends |
|---|---|
| Regulatory Landscape | Regulatory uncertainty in some jurisdictions (e.g., USA state-level differences, EU debates on third-party funding rules) |
| Technology Innovations | Adoption of legal analytics for case assessment and litigation finance management platforms |
| Market Adoption | Growth in commercial litigation, class actions, and international arbitration funding |
| Sustainability Trends | Demand for ethical and transparent funding structures |
| Market Competition | Dominated by established litigation funding firms ( Burford Capital, Omni Bridgeway, Therium, Augusta Ventures, Validity Finance) |
| Consumer Trends | Demand for corporate litigation financing, IP dispute funding, and contingency-based legal funding |
| Market Shift | 2025 to 2035 Projections |
|---|---|
| Regulatory Landscape | Stricter compliance regulations, transparency mandates, and AI-based risk assessment frameworks |
| Technology Innovations | Advancements in AI-powered litigation prediction, blockchain -based litigation funding, and smart contract enforcement |
| Market Adoption | Expansion into mass torts, ESG litigation funding, and AI-driven investment risk mitigation |
| Sustainability Trends | Large-scale adoption of blockchain -powered legal financing, decentralized litigation investment platforms, and ESG-driven legal funding |
| Market Competition | Rise of AI-driven litigation investment startups, decentralized legal funding networks, and tokenized legal assets |
| Consumer Trends | Growth in tech-enabled litigation financing, real-time AI case scoring, and publicly accessible litigation funding platforms |
The increasing prevalence of third-party litigation funding in commercial disputes, intellectual property litigation, and class-action suits is fueling strong growth in the United States Litigation Funding Investment market. Growth of the market is attributed to the growing use of litigation funding in law firms and organizations.
The need for litigation finance by big litigation finance firm, evolving regulatory frameworks, and interest from investors in high-yielding legal funding deals are also contributing to the market expansion. The growing application of AI-enabled case assessment tools is enhancing decision-making in litigation funding as well.
| Country | CAGR (2025 to 2035) |
|---|---|
| USA | 9.4% |
Recent years have seen a substantial growth in the market for the commercial provision of funding for litigation as well as arbitration and insolvency proceedings across due to the favourable policy landscape in the UK, litigation finance has emerged as a compelling alternative asset class that has attracted interest from institutional investors and private equity players alike.
Demand in the market is also being fed by a growing popularity with deals in which lawyers agree to work without charge until a case is won, and portfolio funding models. In addition, the UK's high profile in national and international dispute resolution is facilitating the growth of investment in litigation funding.
| Country | CAGR (2025 to 2035) |
|---|---|
| UK | 8.8% |
The EU litigation funding investment market has been rising in really transformational stages, and its growth is thanks to increasing legal expenses, corporate litigation, and rising cross-border dispute settlement mechanisms. Private equity players are increasingly participating in litigation financing, which then has a market effect
The Netherlands, along with Germany and France, are key markets as demand for litigation funding grows in matters of commercial arbitration and antitrust disputes. Furthermore, evolving regulatory framework of EU has been pushing the adoption of litigation finance as an alternative investment class.
| Country | CAGR (2025 to 2035) |
|---|---|
| EU | 8.7% |
Litigation funding investment market for Japan shows slow changes in the legal finance environment and a greater interest in alternative dispute resolution structures. Funding demand for intellectual property and commercial litigation cases also is rising.
Litigation funding is still an infant industry in Japan, but foreign law firms and private investors are eyeing high-value disputes as opportunities. Additionally, regulatory changes aimed at increasing transparency in litigation finance are impacting trends in the market.
| Country | CAGR (2025 to 2035) |
|---|---|
| Japan | 9.0% |
South Korea litigation funding investment (Self-Financing) South Korea is booming, as these companies are increasingly familiar with third-party legal finance and litigation cases are increasing. Demand for litigation funding is being supported by a growing domestic market for legal services and the improvement of intellectual property legislation in the country.
Increasing government support for arbitration and alternative dispute resolution is another factor contributing to market growth. Additionally, there is a growing investor appetite for legal financing as an asset class, which is also contributing to the growth of the South Korean litigation funding market.
| Country | CAGR (2025 to 2035) |
|---|---|
| South Korea | 8.9% |
Commercial litigation funding has emerged as the most prominent model in litigation finance, allowing firms to pursue worthy legal claims without facing the financial burden of costly legal action. Commercial litigation funding covers contract disputes, intellectual property claims, antitrust litigation, and business torts, allowing corporations to pursue their day in court without draining internal capital.
One of the top reasons for the adoption of commercial litigation funding is its potential to level the playing field for cash-strapped companies. Many small businesses, start-ups, and even large companies rely on third-party litigation funders to sue multinational corporations, governments, or industry players to obtain fair and just dispute settlement.
Additionally, litigation funders typically offer non-recourse funding structures, meaning if the case does not succeed the claimant does not have to pay back the funding, which acts as risk mitigation for companies engaging in high-stakes legal war. Akin to investment in other industries, it provides both case diversification and potential long-term financial returns to many investors and litigation finance firms.
Commercial litigation funding, though advantageous, faces obstacles with challenging case evaluations, extended legal processes, and heightened regulatory focus, urging investors to develop AI-driven risk evaluation systems, predictive case outcome analytics, and jurisdiction specialized legal financing solutions to support better decision-making and portfolio management.
The increasing complexity and cost of legal proceedings around the world is one of the major drivers behind growing demand for funding of international arbitration. Litigation funders cover arbitration, expert witness, and enforcement fees, providing more liquidity, which many businesses that trade, collaborate, and build internationally need to desolate their cash flows.
Additionally, litigation financiers help to achieve diversification and global market exposure by including international arbitration claims in their portfolios, and new players in emerging markets as well as high-stakes investment disputes are entering the market.
Advocating investment from such firms may bridge the gap to fund in-house investments, yet the majority of law firms and in-house corporate legal department’s partner with litigation funding firms specialized in cross-border claim validation, ensuring that they will have access to litigation with guaranteed strategic funding relationships.
Despite all its benefits, hurdles in international arbitration funding are due to differences in jurisdiction, complexity of enforcement, and confidentiality issues, leading investors to demand stricter due diligence processes, more robust case-specific risk management frameworks, and AI-driven legal analytics platforms that ensure better funding outcomes and higher success rates in the field of law. Litigation funding for MSMEs to overcome payment problems in legal proceedings
The biggest sector in the market for litigation funding is micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) - as these companies typically lack resources to pursue legal action against large enterprises or government institutions. Litigation funding is a major financial saviour for MSMEs entangled in contract disputes and intellectual property claims, as well as debt recovery cases, enabling them to access legal recourse without hampering their business.
This shows that access to justice for financially stressed businesses can be released with the help of MSME litigation funding, therefore making it a major driver for MSME litigation funding adoption.
This allows various entrepreneurs, startups owners, tech sector businesses, family businesses, and corporations to pursue and protect business interest by filing legal cases against companies that practice unfair business practices, patent infringement, or breach of contract, without the need to spend money upfront as most of these businesses cannot afford litigation fees which are funded by legal funds.
Additionally, litigation finance provides MSME with access to funding for legal fees, which ultimately protects working capital and enables business to continue cash flow during the litigation period. Many financial institutions also private equity in investors are diversifying litigation finance portfolios to include MSME-focused funding facilities, ensuring that smaller enterprises caught in litigation have access to much necessary capital.
Despite the benefits, MSME litigation funding is accompanied by case complexity assessment issues, uncertain timelines for legal proceedings, and perceived venture risks from targeted companies, inspiring funders to develop computerized case classification engines, analytical disputes viability metrics, and risk-adjusted financings, leading to higher sustainability for funding and success rates for lawsuits.
America, meanwhile, is increasingly viewing litigation finance as a strategic financial tool to manage legal exposures, improve enterprise cash flow and pursue high-value plaintiffs without hitting balance sheets. As such, businesses undertake complex legal wars, including antitrust lawsuits, shareholder actions and regulatory conflicts, all with extensive financial backing for lengthy legal efforts.
One of the key forces behind the rise of the use of commercial litigation funding among large corporations is rising interest in non-traditional capital sources to paybig bills for court battles. Multinational corporations will transfer burdens of legal costs onto third-party financiers, thus better managing their own financial risk whilst potentially maximizing any potential legal recoveries.
In addition, large corporations engage in portfolio-based litigation funding in which many separate legal claims are funded under the same funding agreement, allowing to spread of risk exposure and generate the highest potential return on investment. Many in-house counsel and legal departments’ partner with litigation financing firms to create tailored legal financing arrangements that ensure cost-efficient and successful litigation solutions are developed.
Such a practice is still subject to regulatory scrutiny and can potentially bring reputational damage, thus making corporations need to embrace AI-based legal risk management, predictive litigation analysis, and transparency-oriented funding arrangements, thus ensuring better compliance and cost efficiency.
The global litigation funding investment market is on a very fast track owing to the rise in the need for third-party finance for the litigation and increase in legal costs and rise in commercial litigation cases. Litigation funding is a mechanism where plaintiffs and law firms are injected with capital in exchange for a portion of the settlement or judgment. Increasing the number of mass cases, intellectual property disputes and financing of litigation by corporates is ultimately fueling the market.
Market Share Analysis by Key Players
| Company/Organization Name | Estimated Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Burford Capital LLC | 18-22% |
| IMF Bentham (Omni Bridgeway ) | 14-18% |
| Litigation Capital Management (LCM) | 12-16% |
| Therium Capital Management | 10-14% |
| Augusta Ventures | 8-12% |
| Others | 26-32% |
| Company/Organization Name | Key Offerings/Activities |
|---|---|
| Burford Capital LLC | Provides litigation financing for commercial disputes, arbitration, and class-action lawsuits. |
| IMF Bentham (Omni Bridgeway ) | Specializes in multi-jurisdictional litigation funding, focusing on antitrust and intellectual property cases. |
| Litigation Capital Management (LCM) | Offers dispute financing for high-value commercial claims, targeting law firms and corporations. |
| Therium Capital Management | Develops legal financing solutions for insolvency cases, business litigation, and group actions. |
| Augusta Ventures | Focuses on portfolio litigation funding, corporate dispute financing, and arbitration cases. |
Key Market Insights
Burford Capital LLC (18-22%)
Burford leads the litigation funding market with high-value commercial dispute financing and international arbitration funding.
IMF Bentham (Omni Bridgeway) (14-18%)
IMF Bentham provides cross-border litigation financing, focusing on class actions, securities disputes, and competition law.
Litigation Capital Management (LCM) (12-16%)
LCM specializes in corporate litigation funding, supporting law firms and claimants in commercial disputes.
Therium Capital Management (10-14%)
Therium offers legal funding for large-scale disputes, including bankruptcy litigation and mass tort claims.
Augusta Ventures (8-12%)
Augusta provides portfolio-based litigation financing, helping businesses manage legal expenses across multiple cases.
Other Key Players (26-32% Combined)
Several emerging litigation finance firms and private equity investors are driving market growth, including:
The overall market size for litigation funding investment market was USD 20,613.8 million in 2025.
The litigation funding investment market is expected to reach USD 49,249.9 million in 2035.
Growing awareness of third-party litigation financing, increasing demand for legal cost management, and rising interest from institutional investors in high-return legal funding opportunities will drive market growth.
The top 5 countries which drives the development of litigation funding investment market are USA, European Union, Japan, South Korea and UK.
International arbitration funding expected to grow to command significant share over the assessment period.
Semiconductor Substrate Market Insights - Trends & Forecast 2025 to 2035
Non-volatile Dual In-line Memory Module (NVDIMM) Market Analysis - Growth & Forecast 2025 to 2035
Unattended Ground Sensors (UGS) Market Trends - Forecast 2025 to 2035
Total Carbon Analyzers Market Growth - Trends & Outlook 2025 to 2035
Ultrasonic Flowmeters Market Trends – Growth & Forecast 2025 to 2035
Submarine Batteries Market Analysis - Growth & Forecast 2025 to 2035
Litigation Funding Investment Market
Thank you!
You will receive an email from our Business Development Manager. Please be sure to check your SPAM/JUNK folder too.
