Sales of FIBC in Japan are estimated to be valued at US$ 405 million in 2023 and are anticipated to reach US$ 655.1 million by 2033. Over the forecast period, FIBC demand in Japan is anticipated to increase at a CAGR of 4.9%. The revenue generated by FIBC in 2022 was US$ 387.9 million and will likely exhibit a y-o-y growth of 4.4% in 2023.
Top Segments and their Statistics
Attributes | Key Insights |
---|---|
Base Value (2022) | US$ 387.9 million |
Estimated Japan FIBC Business Revenue (2023) | US$ 405.0 million |
Projected Japan FIBC Business Revenue (2033) | US$ 655.1 million |
Value-based CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 4.9% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
As per the latest report, FIBC revenue in Japan is predicted to expand over 1.6X through 2033, amid a 2.9% increase in estimated CAGR compared to the historical one. This is attributable to the robust growth of sectors, including food, agriculture, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, and the rising demand for bulk flexible packaging solutions.
Other Factors Driving FIBC Demand in Japan Include
Key Trends in Japan FIBC Business Include
Factors that Can Negatively Impact FIBC Sales in Japan
Sales of Type D FIBC Bags Will Likely Outpace Other Bag Types
As per the latest report, the type A FIBC bags segment will retain its dominance in Japan during the forecast period. It is expected to hold a value share of 39.1% by 2033. This is due to the increasing usage of these bags for packaging and transporting non-hazardous materials.
Emerging trends, however, predict sales of type D FIBC bags to outpace other bag types during the assessment period. The target segment is set to thrive at a CAGR of 5.9% through 2033. This is attributable to the rising adoption of type D FIBC bags for storing and transporting flammable powders, hazardous materials, and combustible specks of dust.
Type D FIBC bags are gaining immense traction across several sectors. This is because they are vital in preventing accidents and protecting workers. These antistatic or static dissipative bags are designed to prevent the accumulation and discharge of static electricity, thereby encouraging their usage for transforming flammable and other dangerous substances.
Type D FIBC bags do not need to be grounded to be effective. This makes them a much safer alternative to type C FIBC bags that are conductive and must be grounded to prevent static discharge.
Flexible intermediate bulk containers (FIBCs) are considered a versatile and economical way to store and transport dry, flowable materials. They are set to be increasingly used in a wide range of sectors and applications due to their several advantages, contributing to sales growth.
FIBCs are relatively lightweight and inexpensive compared to other types of bulk containers. This is driving their demand in diverse verticals. They can save space and time owing to their stackable nature, which is estimated to aid demand. These packaging solutions can also be customized to meet the specific needs of end users, thereby augmenting demand.
The rising usage of FIBCs in the food and pharmaceutical sectors is further expected to boost sales across Japan. These bulk packaging solutions are set to be widely used in these sectors to transport and store a variety of products, including rice, flour, grains, and pharmaceuticals. To benefit from this, companies are expected to develop novel FIBCs for food and pharmaceutical businesses.
The growing need to reduce the overall weight of bulk packaging is anticipated to fuel the demand for flexible intermediate bulk containers (FIBCs). This is because these packaging solutions can significantly reduce the weight of bulk packaging, leading to lower transportation costs. They are becoming ideal alternatives to drums, sacks, and others.
FIBC sales in Japan recorded a CAGR of 2.0% during the historical period. Total revenue in the country reached around US$ 387.9 million in 2022. From 2023 to 2033, demand for FIBCs in Japan is set to thrive at a steady CAGR of 4.9%.
Historical CAGR (2018 to 2022) | 2.0% |
---|---|
Forecast CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 4.9% |
The FIBC business in Japan is anticipated to witness steady growth over the forecast period. This is due to factors such as the rising demand for flexible packaging solutions, robust growth of end-use industries, and innovation in FIBCs.
Different kinds of specialized FIBCs are gaining traction across end-use industries, contributing to sales growth in Japan. These packaging solutions are widely used to store and package distinct goods such as food products, agro products, chemicals, polymers, and building materials.
The rapid growth of the chemical business in Japan is expected to bolster sales of FIBCs during the assessment period. This is because these containers are increasingly employed for storing and supplying a wide range of basic ingredients or chemicals.
In Japan, the total value of shipments in the chemical business accounted for US$ 426.1 billion in 2020. This figure will likely increase amid the expansion of the chemical sector in Japan and will create growth prospects for manufacturers of FIBC.
Manufacturers in Japan are investing in sustainable packaging solutions, which has generated the need for developing sustainable FIBC. Implementation of rules and initiatives taken by the government of Japan for promoting sustainable packaging will likely create future growth parameters in the FIBC business. These include the reduction of plastic waste by 25% by 2030.
Flexible intermediate bulk containers are significantly used packaging formats for storing and transporting dry or solid materials. Their usage and demand are rising significantly, thereby prompting companies to employ automation as manual filling and removal processes are very time-consuming and labor-intensive.
In Japan, where there is a shortage of labor and a high proportion of elderly citizens, automation in manufacturing and production lines is very crucial. Automated FIBC packaging lines would aid in better handling and streamlining the process.
Automated processes such as automatic unstacking and delivery of pallets to bulk bag filling stations, automation slip sheet dispensers, and automated bag removal by conveyers can influence the FIBC business growth, especially in Japan. End users of FIBC can adopt this mechanization in the packaging sector to stay ahead and reorganize the workflow, contributing to revenue growth.
Rapid economic growth and industrialization have resulted in an increasing need for solutions to transport goods that are cost-effective and efficient in protecting materials. Textile is being preferred by companies, including bulk bags, polyolefin woven sacks, jute bags, and others.
Several companies are shifting toward using FIBC as it offers better protection of material being transported and allows the ease of procurement in empty FIBCs. The flexibility of bulk bags allows transportation without pallets that too at a lower cost when compared to rigid IBCs, which are set to drive demand.
Packaged bulk bags have a low package-to-product weight ratio, while emptied bags are compact and lightweight, reducing transportation costs and space as they can be easily stacked. The availability of several FIBCs, including loop design, top and bottom design, bag style options, and fabric options, is impacting the growth of the FIBC business in Japan.
Semi-annual Update
The table presents the expected CAGR for the Japan FIBC business over several semi-annual periods spanning from 2022 to 2033. In the first half (H1) of the decade from 2022 to 2032, the business is expected to surge at a CAGR of 4.7%, followed by a slightly lower growth rate of 4.3% in the second half (H2) of the same decade.
Moving into the subsequent period, from H1 2023 to H2 2033, the CAGR is projected to increase slightly to 4.4% in the first half and remain average at 3.9% in the second half. These values offer insights into the anticipated growth trends for the Japan FIBC business, aiding stakeholders and investors in making informed decisions regarding investments & strategies.
Particular | Value CAGR |
---|---|
H1 (2022 to 2032) | 4.7% |
H2 (2022 to 2032) | 4.3% |
H1 (2023 to 2033) | 4.4% |
H2 (2023 to 2033) | 3.9% |
Based on capacity, the 250 to 750 kg segment is expected to dominate Japan during the forecast period. It is projected to thrive at a 4.8% CAGR through 2033. The type A FIBC bag segment is set to hold a prominent value share throughout the projection period. It will likely expand at a 4.6% CAGR between 2023 and 2033.
Capacity | Value CAGR |
---|---|
Up to 250 Kgs | 3.9% |
250 to 750 Kg | 4.8% |
Above 750 Kgs | 6.1% |
FIBCs having a capacity of 250 to 750 kgs are prominently preferred by the end-use industries due to ease of handling. The use of these bags aligns with global packaging standards and allows efficient transportation and storage of bulk goods. They can hold a significant amount of material, reducing the need for additional storage space.
The 250 to 750 kg segment is poised to maintain its leading share, holding about 43.2% by 2033. It will likely exhibit a CAGR of 4.8% through 2033. This is attributed to the rising usage of these FIBCs for storing and transporting a wide range of materials, including food, chemicals, sand, cement, fertilizers, grains, and rice.
Bag Type | Value CAGR |
---|---|
Type A | 4.6% |
Type B | 4.5% |
Type C | 5.5% |
Type D | 5.9% |
As per the latest Japan FIBC industry analysis, type A FIBC bags will likely remain a popular bag type across Japan, thriving at 4.6% CAGR. This is due to the rising usage of these bags to package and transport non-hazardous materials such as sand and cement on account of their inexpensive nature.
Type A FIBC bags are set to be widely favored in Japan as they comply with industrial standards, ensuring they meet safety requirements for transportation and storage. Companies are projected to make these bags mainly from plain woven polypropylene and other non-conductive fabrics.
Type A FIBC bags are designed for easy handling, featuring lifting loops or handles facilitating their movement. Their ease of use contributes to improved productivity and operational efficiency.
Type A bag is envisioned to hold a leading revenue share of 40.6% in 2023. This is attributed to their reusability. They are expected to help in reducing the amount of waste generated from packaging materials. They are estimated to be one of the most affordable solutions for packaging, which brings significant cost savings.
FIBC manufacturing companies in Japan are focusing on offering high-quality products that meet industry standards. They are investing heavily in research and development activities for developing or improving the material, design, and construction of FIBCs.
Key players are also differentiating themselves by offering customized solutions for the unique needs of sectors and applications by working with their customers and understanding their requirements.
Recent Activities of FIBC Manufacturers
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Estimated Value (2023) | US$ 405.0 million |
Projected Value (2033) | US$ 655.1 million |
Estimated Growth Rate (2023 to 2033) | 4.9% CAGR |
Historical Data | 2018 to 2022 |
Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
Quantitative Units | Revenue in US$ million |
Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Volume Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, Trends and Pricing Analysis |
Segments Covered | Capacity, Bag Type, Design, End-use, Sub-region |
Key Sub-regions Covered | Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kansai, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu & Okinawa |
Key Companies Profiled | Grief, Inc.; Berry Global Inc.; Intertape Polymer Group; LC Packaging International BV; Mitsubishi Corp.; Nihon Matai Co. Ltd. (Rengo Group); Kohsei Co., Ltd.; SHIBATA INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD.; Media International Co. Ltd.; Yamanaka Shokai Co. Ltd.; Hagihara Industries Inc.; SHIOYA Co. Ltd.; SMC CO. LTD.; Taiyo Kogyo Corporation |
Japan FIBC business revenue totaled US$ 387.9 million in 2022.
FIBC sales in Japan are estimated to total US$ 405.0 million in 2023.
Demand for FIBCs in Japan is set to rise at a 4.9% CAGR through 2033.
Total revenue in Japan is anticipated to reach US$ 655.1 million by 2033.
Nihon Matai (Rengo Group), LLC, Hagihara Industries Inc., and Mitsubishi Corp. are the top players.
Building & construction, food, and chemicals are key sectors that use FIBC bags.
1. Executive Summary 1.1. Industry Outlook 1.2. Industry Analysis 1.3. Analysis and Recommendations 2. Overview 2.1. Business Coverage / Taxonomy 2.2. Business Definition / Scope / Limitations 3. Key Trends 3.1. Key Trends Impacting Sales Growth 3.2. Product Innovation / Development Trends 4. Key Success Factors 4.1. Product Adoption / Usage Analysis 4.2. Product USP’s / Features 4.3. Strategic Promotional Strategies 5. Demand Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033 5.1. Historical Volume (Units) Analysis, 2018 to 2022 5.2. Current and Future Volume (Units) Projections, 2023 to 2033 5.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 6. Pricing Analysis 6.1. Pricing Analysis 6.2. Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark 6.3. Delivered Duty Unpaid (DDU) basis for major countries 7. Demand (in Value or Size in US$ million) Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033 7.1. Historical Value (US$ million) Analysis, 2018 to 2022 7.2. Current and Future Value (US$ million) Projections, 2023 to 2033 7.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 7.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis 8. Business Background 8.1. Global Packaging Industry Outlook 8.2. Global Flexible Packaging Industry Outlook 8.3. Macro-Economic Factors 8.4. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact 8.5. Value Chain 8.5.1. Raw Material Suppliers 8.5.2. FIBC Manufacturers/Distributors 8.5.3. End-users 8.6. Case Based Scenario – Impact Assessment 8.6.1. Current Statistics 8.6.2. Short-Mid-Long Term Outlook 8.6.3. Likely Rebound 8.7. Key Dynamics 8.7.1. Drivers 8.7.2. Restraints 8.7.3. Opportunity Analysis 9. Industry Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Bag Type 9.1. Introduction / Key Findings 9.2. Historical Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Bag Type, 2018 to 2022 9.3. Current and Future Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Bag Type, 2023 to 2033 9.3.1. Type A 9.3.2. Type B 9.3.3. Type C 9.3.4. Type D 9.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Bag Type, 2018 to 2022 9.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Bag Type, 2023 to 2033 10. Industry Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Capacity 10.1. Introduction / Key Findings 10.2. Historical Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Capacity, 2018 to 2022 10.3. Current and Future Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Capacity, 2023 to 2033 10.3.1. Up to 250 Kgs 10.3.2. 250 Kgs to 750 Kgs 10.3.3. Above 750 Kgs 10.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Capacity, 2018 to 2022 10.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Capacity, 2023 to 2033 11. Industry Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Design 11.1. Introduction / Key Findings 11.2. Historical Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By Design, 2018 to 2022 11.3. Current and Future Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By Application, 2023 to 2033 11.3.1. U Panel Bag 11.3.2. Four Side Panel 11.3.3. Baffle 11.3.4. Circular/ Tabular 11.3.5. Cross Corner 11.4. Y–o–Y Growth Trend Analysis By Design, 2018 to 2022 11.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Design, 2023 to 2033 12. Industry Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By End-use 12.1. Introduction / Key Findings 12.2. Historical Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis By End-use, 2018 to 2022 12.3. Current and Future Value (US$ million) & Volume (Units) Analysis and Forecast By End-use, 2023 to 2033 12.3.1. Building and Construction 12.3.2. Chemicals and Fertilizers 12.3.3. Food Products and Agriculture 12.3.4. Pharmaceutical Products 12.3.5. Mining 12.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By End-use, 2018 to 2022 12.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By End-use, 2023 to 2033 13. Structure Analysis 13.1. Analysis by Tier of Companies (FIBC) 13.2. Share Analysis of Top Players 13.3. Presence Analysis 14. Competition Analysis 14.1. Competition Dashboard 14.2. Competition Benchmarking 14.3. Competition Deep Dive 14.3.1. Grief, Inc. 14.3.1.1.1. Overview 14.3.1.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.1.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.1.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.1.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.1.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.1.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.1.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.2. Berry Global Inc. 14.3.2.1. Overview 14.3.2.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.2.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.2.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.2.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.2.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.2.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.2.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.3. Intertape Polymer Group 14.3.3.1. Overview 14.3.3.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.3.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.3.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.3.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.3.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.3.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.3.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.4. LC Packaging International BV 14.3.4.1. Overview 14.3.4.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.4.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.4.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.4.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.4.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.4.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.4.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.5. Nihon Matai Co., Ltd. (Rengo Group) 14.3.5.1. Overview 14.3.5.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.5.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.5.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.5.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.5.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.5.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.5.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.6. Kohsei Co., Ltd. 14.3.6.1. Overview 14.3.6.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.6.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.6.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.6.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.6.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.6.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.6.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.7. SHIBATA INDUSTRIAL CO.LTD. 14.3.7.1. Overview 14.3.7.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.7.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.7.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.7.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.7.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.7.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.7.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.8. Media International Co. Ltd. 14.3.8.1. Overview 14.3.8.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.8.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.8.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.8.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.8.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.8.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.8.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.9. Yamanaka Shokai Co. Ltd. 14.3.9.1. Overview 14.3.9.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.9.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.9.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.9.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.9.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.9.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.9.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.10. Hagihara Industries Inc. 14.3.10.1. Overview 14.3.10.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.10.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.10.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.10.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.10.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.10.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.10.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.11. SHIOYA co., ltd. 14.3.11.1. Overview 14.3.11.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.11.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.11.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.11.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.11.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.11.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.11.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.12. SMC CO. LTD. 14.3.12.1. Overview 14.3.12.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.12.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.12.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.12.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.12.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.12.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.12.5.3. Capacity Strategy 14.3.13. Taiyo Kogyo Corporation 14.3.13.1. Overview 14.3.13.2. Product Portfolio 14.3.13.3. Profitability by Key Segments (Bag Type/Capacity/Design/End-use/Region) 14.3.13.4. Sales Footprint 14.3.13.5. Strategy Overview 14.3.13.5.1. Business Strategy 14.3.13.5.2. Product Strategy 14.3.13.5.3. Capacity Strategy *The above list is indicative in nature and is subject to change during the course of research 15. Assumptions and Acronyms Used 16. Research Methodology
Explore Packaging Insights
View Reports