The carbon-negative packaging market size is projected to be valued at US$ 77.0 million in 2023 and is expected to rise to US$ 145.0 million by 2033. The sales of carbon-negative packaging are projected to expand at a significant CAGR of 6.5% during the forecast period.
The packaging industry has been facing significant challenges due to its detrimental environmental effects. Traditional packaging materials, such as plastics and metals, contribute to pollution, resource depletion, and climate change. The need for alternative packaging solutions that minimize these negative impacts has become increasingly urgent.
Carbon-negative packaging has emerged as a novel strategy that tries to reduce the environmental impact of standard packaging materials while also contributing to sustainability efforts.
What is Carbon-negative Packaging?
Carbon-negative packaging goes beyond simply reducing carbon emissions; it actively removes carbon from the atmosphere that it emits during its entire life cycle. This innovative approach involves using materials and processes that sequester carbon, resulting in a net reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Key Benefits of Carbon-negative Packaging?
Carbon-Negative Packaging Technologies
Carbon Capture and Storage: Carbon emissions are captured and stored using advanced technology during the manufacturing and use of packaging materials. The trapped carbon is subsequently buried or repurposed for other uses, preventing it from escaping the atmosphere.
Life Cycle Assessment and Analysis: Comprehensive life cycle analyses assist in determining the environmental impact of packaging materials and processes. Packaging designers may make informed judgments to reduce carbon emissions by analyzing the full life cycle, from raw material extraction through disposal.
Sustainable Manufacturing and Distribution: Carbon-negative packaging entails optimizing manufacturing and distribution processes to reduce energy usage, waste generation, and transportation emissions. Implementing renewable energy and efficient logistics helps to achieve carbon negative.
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Carbon-negative Packaging Market Estimated Size (2023) | US$ 77.0 million |
| Carbon-negative Packaging Market CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 6.5% |
| Carbon-negative Packaging Market Forecasted Size (2033) | US$ 145.0 million |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
Historically, the growing awareness of environmental issues and the necessity for sustainable packaging solutions drove the need for carbon-negative packaging. Consumers, governments, and corporations began to recognize the negative environmental effects of traditional packaging materials, resulting in a shift in preferences toward eco-friendly alternatives.
In the future, the carbon-negative packaging market is predicted to increase significantly and boost sales prospects. Additionally, the need to address climate change and environmental challenges is projected to become pressing. As organizations and consumers seek solutions that actively decrease carbon emissions and contribute to sustainability, demand for carbon-negative packaging is likely to rise.
Governments around the world are going to impose strict restrictions and offer incentives to encourage the adoption of sustainable packaging practices. Businesses across various industries are increasingly integrating sustainability into their corporate strategies. Moreover, with sustainability becoming a key differentiator, companies invest in carbon-negative packaging to meet their sustainability goals, enhance their brand reputation, and capture consumer loyalty.
According to FMI, the market is likely to witness a growth rate of 6.5% between 2023 and 2033, in comparison to 3.7% from 2018 to 2022.
Investing in the carbon-negative packaging industry can help organizations gain a competitive advantage, increase supply chain efficiency, and satisfy sustainability goals.
Here are several strategies that can facilitate business expansion and success:
Principal Consultant
Bioplastics are one of the packaging materials that have a substantial market share in the carbon-negative packaging sector. Bioplastics are made from renewable resources such as corn flour, sugarcane, or cellulose, and they have various environmental advantages. Given their biodegradability, composability, and small carbon footprint, they have gained favor as a viable alternative to standard plastics.
Bioplastics have been widely used in a variety of industries, including food and beverage, personal care, and consumer product packaging. Their adaptability and compatibility with existing packaging methods have helped them gain market share. Furthermore, advances in bioplastic technology have resulted in great performance and increased adoption by businesses and consumers alike.
In the food and beverage business, carbon-negative packaging solutions frequently focus on materials such as bioplastics, compostable materials, and alternative packaging options. These materials offer biodegradability, low carbon emissions, and functional packaging qualities. These materials further help to maintain the freshness and quality of food and beverages while reducing their environmental impact.
The food and beverage industry has been aggressive in adopting sustainable practices and resolving packaging-related environmental concerns. Many organizations in this area have ambitious sustainability goals and are actively exploring carbon-negative packaging solutions to satisfy these goals and remain competitive.
The region's well-established food and beverage industry has played a critical role in encouraging carbon-negative packaging usage. Food manufacturers, retailers, and restaurants in North America have recognized the need for sustainable packaging practices in meeting consumer expectations while reducing their environmental imprint.
The legislative environment in North America has been favorable to sustainable packaging initiatives. Regulations and guidelines aiming at reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable practices have been adopted in both the United States and Canada. These restrictions have motivated enterprises to use carbon-negative packaging solutions, increasing the region's market share of such packaging materials.
In Europe, the food and beverage industry has been a significant driver of carbon-negative packaging usage. Consumers in the region place a premium on eco-friendly packaging and actively seek products with a low environmental impact.
Governments of Europe have enacted tough legislation and procedures for extended producer responsibility (EPR) to encourage sustainable packaging practices. These rules, such as the European Green Deal and the Circular Economy Action Plan, encourage businesses to use low-carbon packaging materials and technologies. The convergence of rules and consumer demand has increased the market share of carbon-negative packaging in Europe.
Many governments in Asia Pacific area have implemented environmental rules and legislation that support sustainable packaging practices. These initiatives encourage firms to use carbon-negative packaging and fund research and development in environment-friendly materials and technology.
The region's increasing middle class has purchasing power and strong expectations for environment-friendly products and packaging. This demographic transition has increased demand for carbon-neutral packaging solutions, particularly in the food and beverage industry.
There is a great demand for packaging materials that are both protective and environment-friendly with the advent of e-commerce in Asia Pacific.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
Several key players and emerging companies are actively involved in developing and providing carbon-negative packaging options. Many startups and innovative ventures have entered the carbon-negative packaging market, focusing specifically on developing sustainable packaging materials and technologies. These companies bring fresh ideas and disruptive solutions, often utilizing bioplastics, compostable materials, and other innovative approaches to reduce carbon emissions and environmental impact.
Competition is expected to intensify, leading to further innovations and improvements in carbon-negative packaging solutions as the market continues to grow. Market players that can differentiate themselves through product quality, sustainability credentials, cost-effectiveness, and responsive customer service are likely to thrive in this competitive landscape.
Latest Developments
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Growth Rate | CAGR of 6.5% from 2023 to 2033 |
| Base Year of Estimation | 2023 |
| Historical Data | 2018 to 2022 |
| Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
| Quantitative Units | Revenue in US$ million and Volume in Units and F-CAGR from 2022 to 2032 |
| Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Volume Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, growth factors, Trends, and Pricing Analysis |
| Key Segments Covered | By Packaging Material, By End User Industry, By Region |
| Regions Covered | North America; Latin America; Europe; East Asia; South Asia; The Middle East & Africa; Oceania |
| Key Countries Profiled | The United States, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Italy, France, The United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, China, Japan, India, GCC Countries, Australia |
| Key Companies Profiled | Phillips Carbon Black Limited; Birla Carbon USA, Inc.; Continental Carbon India Limited; Cabot Corporation; Tokai Carbon Group (Cancarb); Sealed Air Corporation; Pregis Corporation; DS Smith Plc; Achilles Corporation; Delphon Industries, LLC; Smurfit Kappa Group; Storopack Hans Reichenecker GmbH; Desco Industries Inc.; Nefab Group; Teknis Limited, Elcom (United Kingdom) Ltd.; GWP Group Limited; International Plastics Inc.; AUER Packaging GmbH; Pure-Stat Engineered Technologies, Inc.; Protective Packaging Corporation; Key Segments |
| Customization & Pricing | Available upon Request |
The market is valued to hit US$ 145 million by 2033.
The market is forecast to register a CAGR of 6.5% through 2033.
The market is estimated to secure a valuation of US$ 77 million in 2023.
During 2018 to 2022, the market grew at a CAGR of 3.7%.
Market expansion is fueled by emerging demand for sustainable alternatives.
In the carbon-negative packaging business, bioplastics segment has a significant market share.
The food and beverage segment to rule the market share in 2023.
1. Executive Summary
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Demand-side Trends
1.3. Supply-side Trends
1.4. Technology Roadmap Analysis
1.5. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Market Background
3.1. Market Dynamics
3.1.1. Drivers
3.1.2. Restraints
3.1.3. Opportunity
3.1.4. Trends
3.2. Scenario Forecast
3.2.1. Demand in Optimistic Scenario
3.2.2. Demand in Likely Scenario
3.2.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario
3.3. Product launches & Recent Developments
3.4. Product Life Cycle Analysis
3.5. Value Chain Analysis
3.5.1. Supply Side Participants and their Roles
3.5.1.1. Producers
3.5.1.2. Mid-Level Participants (Traders/ Agents/ Brokers)
3.5.1.3. Wholesalers and Distributors
3.5.2. % of Operating Margin Analysis
3.5.3. List of Existing and Potential Buyer’s
3.6. Pricing Analysis
3.6.1. Price Point Assessment by Region
3.6.2. Price Point Assessment by production
3.6.3. Price Forecast till 2033
3.6.4. Factors affecting pricing
3.7. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact
3.8. Regulatory Landscape
3.9. Regional Parent Market Outlook
3.10. Production and Consumption Statistics
3.11. Consumers Survey Analysis
3.12. Macro-Economic Factors
4. Global Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033
4.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis, 2018 to 2022
4.2. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Projections, 2023 to 2033
4.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
4.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
5. Global Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Material
5.1. Introduction / Key Findings
5.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis By Material, 2018 to 2022
5.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis and Forecast By
5.3.1. Material, 2023 to 2033
5.3.2. Bioplastics
5.3.3. Paper and Cardboard
5.3.4. Bio-based Polymers
5.3.5. Compostable Materials
5.3.6. Others (Glass, Metal, Natural Fibers, etc.)
5.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Material, 2018 to 2022
5.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Material, 2023 to 2033
6. Global Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Packaging
6.1. Formats
6.2. Introduction / Key Findings
6.3. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis By Packaging Formats,
6.3.1. 2018 to 2022
6.4. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis and Forecast By
6.4.1. Packaging Formats, 2023 to 2033
6.4.2. Bottles & Containers
6.4.3. Bags & Pouches
6.4.4. Cartons & Boxes
6.4.5. Labels & Wraps
6.4.6. Others (Tubes, Blister Packs, etc.)
6.5. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Packaging Formats, 2018 to 2022
6.6. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Packaging Formats, 2023 to 2033
7. Global Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By End Use
7.1. Introduction / Key Findings
7.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis By End Use, 2018 to 2022
7.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis and Forecast By
7.3.1. End Use, 2023 to 2033
7.3.2. Food & Beverage
7.3.3. Personal Care and Cosmetics
7.3.4. Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals
7.3.5. E-commerce and Logistics
7.3.6. Others (Electronics, Automotive, etc.)
7.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By End Use, 2018 to 2022
7.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By End Use, 2023 to 2033
8. Global Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Region
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis By Region, 2018 to 2022
8.3. Current Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Analysis and Forecast By Region,
8.4. 2023 to 2033
8.4.1. North America
8.4.2. Latin America
8.4.3. Europe
8.4.4. East Asia
8.4.5. South Asia
8.4.6. Oceania
8.4.7. MEA
8.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
9. North America Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
9.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
9.2. 2018 to 2022
9.3. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
9.3.1. By Country
9.3.1.1. USA
9.3.1.2. Canada
9.3.2. By Material
9.3.3. By Packaging Formats
9.3.4. By End Use
9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
9.4.1. By Country
9.4.2. By Material
9.4.3. By Packaging Formats
9.4.4. By End Use
9.5. Key Takeaways
10. Latin America Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
10.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
10.1.1. 2018 to 2022
10.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
10.2.1. By Country
10.2.1.1. Brazil
10.2.1.2. Mexico
10.2.1.3. Argentina
10.2.1.4. Chile
10.2.1.5. Peru
10.2.1.6. Rest of Latin America
10.2.2. By Material
10.2.3. By Packaging Formats
10.2.4. By End Use
10.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
10.3.1. By Country
10.3.2. By Material
10.3.3. By Packaging Formats
10.3.4. By End Use
10.4. Key Takeaways
11. Europe Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
11.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
11.1.1. 2018 to 2022
11.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
11.2.1. By Country
11.2.1.1. Germany
11.2.1.2. Italy
11.2.1.3. France
11.2.1.4. UK
11.2.1.5. Spain
11.2.1.6. Russia
11.2.1.7. BENELUX
11.2.1.8. Poland
11.2.1.9. Nordic Countries
11.2.1.10. Rest of Europe
11.2.2. By Material
11.2.3. By Packaging Formats
11.2.4. By End Use
11.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.3.1. By Country
11.3.2. By Material
11.3.3. By Packaging Formats
11.3.4. By End Use
11.4. Key Takeaways
12. East Asia Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
12.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
12.1.1. 2018 to 2022
12.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
12.2.1. By Country
12.2.1.1. China
12.2.1.2. Japan
12.2.1.3. South Korea
12.2.2. By Material
12.2.3. By Packaging Formats
12.2.4. By End Use
12.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.3.1. By Country
12.3.2. By Material
12.3.3. By Packaging Formats
12.3.4. By End Use
12.4. Key Takeaways
13. South Asia Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
13.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
13.1.1. 2018 to 2022
13.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
13.2.1. By Country
13.2.1.1. India
13.2.1.2. Thailand
13.2.1.3. Malaysia
13.2.1.4. Indonesia
13.2.1.5. Singapore
13.2.1.6. Rest of South Asia
13.2.2. By Material
13.2.3. By Packaging Formats
13.2.4. By End Use
13.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.3.1. By Country
13.3.2. By Material
13.3.3. By Packaging Formats
13.3.4. By End Use
13.4. Key Takeaways
14. Oceania Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
14.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
14.1.1. 2018 to 2022
14.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
14.2.1. By Country
14.2.1.1. Australia
14.2.1.2. New Zealand
14.2.2. By Material
14.2.3. By Packaging Formats
14.2.4. By End Use
14.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
14.3.1. By Country
14.3.2. By Material
14.3.3. By Packaging Formats
14.3.4. By End Use
14.4. Key Takeaways
15. MEA Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
15.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy,
15.1.1. 2018 to 2022
15.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) & Volume (Tonnes) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
15.2.1. By Country
15.2.1.1. GCC Countries
15.2.1.2. South Africa
15.2.1.3. Central Africa
15.2.1.4. North Africa
15.2.2. By Material
15.2.3. By Packaging Formats
15.2.4. By End Use
15.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
15.3.1. By Country
15.3.2. By Material
15.3.3. By Packaging Formats
15.3.4. By End Use
15.4. Key Takeaways
16. Key Countries Analysis
16.1. USA
16.1.1. Pricing Analysis
16.1.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.1.2.1. By Material
16.1.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.1.2.3. By End Use
16.2. Canada
16.2.1. Pricing Analysis
16.2.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.2.2.1. By Material
16.2.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.2.2.3. By End Use
16.3. Brazil
16.3.1. Pricing Analysis
16.3.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.3.2.1. By Material
16.3.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.3.2.3. By End Use
16.4. Mexico
16.4.1. Pricing Analysis
16.4.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.4.2.1. By Material
16.4.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.4.2.3. By End Use
16.5. Argentina
16.5.1. Pricing Analysis
16.5.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.5.2.1. By Material
16.5.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.5.2.3. By End Use
16.6. Chile
16.6.1. Pricing Analysis
16.6.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.6.2.1. By Material
16.6.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.6.2.3. By End Use
16.7. Peru
16.7.1. Pricing Analysis
16.7.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.7.2.1. By Material
16.7.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.7.2.3. By End Use
16.8. Germany
16.8.1. Pricing Analysis
16.8.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.8.2.1. By Material
16.8.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.8.2.3. By End Use
16.9. Italy
16.9.1. Pricing Analysis
16.9.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.9.2.1. By Material
16.9.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.9.2.3. By End Use
16.10. France
16.10.1. Pricing Analysis
16.10.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.10.2.1. By Material
16.10.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.10.2.3. By End Use
16.11. Spain
16.11.1. Pricing Analysis
16.11.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.11.2.1. By Material
16.11.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.11.2.3. By End Use
16.12. UK
16.12.1. Pricing Analysis
16.12.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.12.2.1. By Material
16.12.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.12.2.3. By End Use
16.13. Russia
16.13.1. Pricing Analysis
16.13.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.13.2.1. By Material
16.13.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.13.2.3. By End Use
16.14. Poland
16.14.1. Pricing Analysis
16.14.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.14.2.1. By Material
16.14.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.14.2.3. By End Use
16.15. BENELUX
16.15.1. Pricing Analysis
16.15.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.15.2.1. By Material
16.15.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.15.2.3. By End Use
16.16. Nordic Countries
16.16.1. Pricing Analysis
16.16.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.16.2.1. By Material
16.16.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.16.2.3. By End Use
16.17. China
16.17.1. Pricing Analysis
16.17.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.17.2.1. By Material
16.17.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.17.2.3. By End Use
16.18. Japan
16.18.1. Pricing Analysis
16.18.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.18.2.1. By Material
16.18.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.18.2.3. By End Use
16.19. South Korea
16.19.1. Pricing Analysis
16.19.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.19.2.1. By Material
16.19.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.19.2.3. By End Use
16.20. India
16.20.1. Pricing Analysis
16.20.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.20.2.1. By Material
16.20.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.20.2.3. By End Use
16.21. Thailand
16.21.1. Pricing Analysis
16.21.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.21.2.1. By Material
16.21.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.21.2.3. By End Use
16.22. Indonesia
16.22.1. Pricing Analysis
16.22.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.22.2.1. By Material
16.22.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.22.2.3. By End Use
16.23. Malaysia
16.23.1. Pricing Analysis
16.23.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.23.2.1. By Material
16.23.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.23.2.3. By End Use
16.24. Singapore
16.24.1. Pricing Analysis
16.24.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.24.2.1. By Material
16.24.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.24.2.3. By End Use
16.25. Australia
16.25.1. Pricing Analysis
16.25.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.25.2.1. By Material
16.25.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.25.2.3. By End Use
16.26. New Zealand
16.26.1. Pricing Analysis
16.26.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.26.2.1. By Material
16.26.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.26.2.3. By End Use
16.27. GCC Countries
16.27.1. Pricing Analysis
16.27.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.27.2.1. By Material
16.27.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.27.2.3. By End Use
16.28. South Africa
16.28.1. Pricing Analysis
16.28.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.28.2.1. By Material
16.28.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.28.2.3. By End Use
16.29. North Africa
16.29.1. Pricing Analysis
16.29.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.29.2.1. By Material
16.29.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.29.2.3. By End Use
16.30. Central Africa
16.30.1. Pricing Analysis
16.30.2. Market Share Analysis, 2023
16.30.2.1. By Material
16.30.2.2. By Packaging Formats
16.30.2.3. By End Use
17. Market Structure Analysis
17.1. Competition Dashboard
17.2. Competition Benchmarking
17.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
17.3.1. By Regional
17.3.2. By Material
17.3.3. By Packaging Formats
17.3.4. By End Use
18. Competition Analysis
18.1. Competition Deep Dive
18.1.1. Sulapac
18.1.1.1. Overview
18.1.1.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.1.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.1.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.1.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.1.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.2. Elopak
18.1.2.1. Overview
18.1.2.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.2.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.2.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.2.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.2.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.3. Stora Enso
18.1.3.1. Overview
18.1.3.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.3.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.3.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.3.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.3.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.4. Woodly Oy
18.1.4.1. Overview
18.1.4.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.4.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.4.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.4.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.4.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.5. Sandland Packaging Ltd.
18.1.5.1. Overview
18.1.5.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.5.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.5.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.5.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.5.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.6. Hartmann
18.1.6.1. Overview
18.1.6.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.6.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.6.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.6.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.6.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.7. Tetra Pak
18.1.7.1. Overview
18.1.7.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.7.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.7.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.7.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.7.5.3. Channel Strategy
18.1.8. BioPak
18.1.8.1. Overview
18.1.8.2. Product Portfolio
18.1.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
18.1.8.4. Sales Footprint
18.1.8.5. Strategy Overview
18.1.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy
18.1.8.5.2. Product Strategy
18.1.8.5.3. Channel Strategy
19. Assumptions & Acronyms Used
20. Research Methodology
Explore Packaging Insights
View Reports
Carbon-negative Packaging Market
