The global bioinsecticides market size is estimated to surpass a valuation of US$ 287 million by 2033. It is anticipated to cross a value of around US$ 101.3 million in 2023. A CAGR of 11.0% is expected for the market in the assessment period 2023 to 2033.
The global market for bioinsecticides stood at a valuation of about US$ 90.5 million in 2022. It is projected to create an absolute dollar opportunity of US$ 185.7 million in the forecast period.
Recent years have seen a steady increase in the market for bioinsecticides. It is mainly driven by a number of compelling considerations that underscore the changing nature of agriculture and pest control.
The pattern is a sign of a more general shift toward ecologically friendly and sustainable agricultural methods. Rising understanding of the detrimental effects of conventional chemical insecticides on human health, non-target creatures, and ecosystem is one of the key drivers.
Alternatives that are less detrimental to both the environment and human well-being are increasingly needed. This is attributed to rising concerns about these effects among consumers and authorities worldwide.
Need for bioinsecticides has increased due to the popularity of integrated pest management (IPM) techniques. IPM reduces the over-reliance on chemical solutions by emphasizing the use of diverse pest management techniques in a holistic strategy.
Since they are made from living things such as fungi, bacteria, and plants, bioinsecticides fit in well with IPM's guiding principles. They offer a powerful tool for managing pest populations. They can also help in preventing the target pests from developing resistance, a problem frequently connected to chemical pesticides.
Invasive pests have expanded to new areas as a result of greater trade and globalization, seriously harming ecosystems and agriculture. Bioinsecticides might have a distinct advantage in the fight against these invading species. They might be carefully formulated to kill these pests without affecting native species.
Bioinsecticides are considered a favored option for preserving biodiversity and ecological equilibrium in agricultural settings. These have a fine targeting capability and little negative effect on helpful insects such as pollinators and predators.
Use of chemical pesticides is subject to stronger laws, which is encouraging producers and landowners to look into more environmentally friendly options. Bioinsecticides are set to be a good option for crops destined for exporting and those subject to strict residue rules.
They frequently have shorter pre-harvest durations and reduced maximum residue levels. Rising use of bioinsecticides as a component of an all-encompassing pest management approach is a result of this regulatory pressure. High demand for food free of residues might also propel sales.
Discovery and creation of new bioinsecticide compositions that offer improved efficacy and extended shelf life is the result of advances in biotechnology & research. Farmers might be more inclined to include these items into their methods for managing pests.
Rising demand for bioinsecticides would reflect a wider shift toward sustainable agriculture. This is expected to put long-term ecological health and food security ahead of short-term concerns.
| Attributes | Key Insights |
|---|---|
| Bioinsecticides Market Estimated Size (2023E) | US$ 101.3 million |
| Projected Market Valuation (2033F) | US$ 287 million |
| Value-based CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 11.0% |
| United States Value-based CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 10.9% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
The global bioinsecticides market expanded at a considerable CAGR of 12.5% in the historical period from 2018 to 2022. It is anticipated to witness a CAGR of 11.0% in the review period.
Due to several criteria that highlight their efficiency and compatibility with contemporary agricultural practices, bioinsecticides are currently gaining headway on a global scale. Growing knowledge about the quality and safety of foods is a key factor promoting their acceptance.
Bioinsecticides might present a convincing response to the growing worries about possible health dangers linked to chemical residues in food. Need for safer and healthier produce is perfectly matched by the handful or nonexistent residues that these organic items leave behind.
Another important factor pushing bioinsecticide demand is the urgent need to tackle global warming and its effects on agriculture. Pests are adapting and expanding as weather conditions become more unpredictable, posing serious dangers to crops.
Bioinsecticides might provide flexible and evolving pest management techniques that can better deal with altering pest behavior brought on by climatic changes. These pesticides are frequently based on living creatures such as helpful insects or microorganisms. Their popularity as an eco-friendly and effective pest control method can be increased by their versatility.
Interconnection of the global market has enhanced knowledge sharing and public understanding of sustainable agriculture practices. Positive outcomes of bioinsecticides in one region of the world can quickly inspire and encourage adoption in other locations.
It is especially apt for developing nations as additional countries face comparable issues in controlling insects and environmental protection. Popularity of bioinsecticides as a tried-and-true substitute for traditional chemical pesticides might expand due to the global dissemination of information and expertise.
| Attributes | Factors |
|---|---|
| Latest Trends |
|
| Market Restraints |
|
| Upcoming Opportunities |
|
Principal Consultant
South Korea bioinsecticides market is likely to create an incremental opportunity of around US$ 10.7 million in the review period. It showcased an average CAGR of 12.1% in the historical period from 2018 to 2022.
Due to a confluence of elements particular to the agricultural environment and consumer tastes of the country, bioinsecticides are gaining popularity in South Korea. Increasing focus on the quality and safety of food in South Korea is one of the motivating factors.
Pesticide residues in food are causing customers to become more concerned, which has increased the desire for safer and better food options. Bioinsecticides fit in suitably with this consumer-driven desire for pure and healthy products. This is due to their low residual levels and negligible effect on non-target organisms.
Dense and varied farming geography of South Korea is a key factor in growth of bioinsecticide sales. There is a need for pest management methods that are both efficient and flexible as different crops are produced in comparatively small spaces.
Targeted approach offered by bioinsecticides is estimated to be ideal for the country's diverse agricultural terrain. These are renowned for their selectivity and capacity for targeting pests while protecting beneficial insects.
Growing importance of bioinsecticides is also influenced by government regulations and incentives. South Korea has been working to encourage organic farming and lessen the use of toxic pesticides.
Accordingly, the government has supported bioinsecticide research, production, and adoption with subsidies, grants, and educational programs. Increased usage of bioinsecticides is a result of the regulatory encouragement given to farmers to look into environmentally suitable alternatives.
For instance, in January 2021, a novel insecticide active ingredient's global registration process started at BASF. In Australia and Korea, the business submitted the Axalion insecticide's regulatory dossiers. The action represents a significant turning point in the growth of BASF's worldwide pesticide portfolio and the company's position as a provider of eco-friendly agricultural technologies.
Japan bioinsecticides market is projected to witness a CAGR of 10.9% in the evaluation period from 2023 to 2033. It is expected to top a valuation of US$ 41.6 million by 2033.
Rising use of bioinsecticides in Japan can be ascribed to a number of elements that are consistent with both the nation's agricultural and cultural norms. Japan's strong focus on preservation of the environment and sustainability is one important reason.
Bioinsecticides fit very well with the country’s dedication to upholding ecological balance and reducing harm to non-target organisms. This is a result of a long history of harmonious living with the environment and a fundamental appreciation for nature.
Japan's emphasis on precision and innovation in agriculture has benefited the development of bioinsecticides. Highly specialized character of bioinsecticides is complemented by the nation's cutting-edge technical landscape.
It includes robotics and precision agricultural methods. These products blend in perfectly with Japan's technologically advanced agricultural processes. These are also frequently tailored to particular pests and might help in enabling effective & precise pest management.
Widespread use of bioinsecticides in Japan has also been fueled by need for secure and natural products. There is a desire for produce free of chemical residues due to discriminating demand that places a premium on health and purity.
Bioinsecticides are expected to provide farmers looking to live up to consumer standards with an appealing choice. These are likely to be popular for leaving behind very little residue.
With the introduction of BASF's Sankei Kotetsu bait pesticide, Japan-based spinach growers will have a new choice for controlling insect pests. The new chemical offers long-term defense against tyrophagus similis. The chemical was created in partnership with Sankei Chemical Co., Ltd.
Another factor augmenting bioinsecticide demand is increasing aging of Japan's farming population. A growing number of people are interested in implementing environmentally friendly and sustainable techniques as younger generations enter the agricultural profession.
New farmers want to ensure the long-term wellbeing of their communities and lands. Bioinsecticides are expected to provide an alternative to traditional chemical pesticides. They are hence projected to be in line with their goals in this regard.
Based on source, the microbials segment is anticipated to witness a CAGR of about 10.9% in the assessment period. It grew steadily at a CAGR of 12.4% in the historical period.
Demand for microbials is expected to surge in the bioinsecticides industry by 2033. Their environmental consciousness is one important aspect.
Microbial bioinsecticides are in accordance with the global movement toward ecologically conscious and sustainable agriculture. They are made from naturally existing microorganisms such as bacteria, fungus, and viruses.
Consumers and farmers looking for safer and more environmentally friendly pest management solutions are expected to push demand. This is attributed to their decreased effect on organisms that are not targeted and low residual levels, which might make them an enticing option.
The problem of pesticide resistance is yet another segment driving factor. Pests that have gained resistance to traditional chemical insecticides are becoming a bigger threat.
Microbial bioinsecticides might offer a new mode of action that would be able to reduce the emergence of resistance. As a result, they are useful tools in integrated pest control techniques. They might offer a novel strategy for reducing pest populations that doesn't only rely on chemicals.
In terms of application, the cereals and grains segment registered a CAGR of 12.1% between 2018 and 2022. It is projected to record a 10.8% CAGR through 2033 in the bioinsecticides market.
Sensitivity of grains and cereals to a wide range of insect pests is a crucial factor pushing demand. Due to their great nutritional value and substantial surface area, these crops frequently serve as an ideal habitat for pests.
They are hence often considered desirable prey. With their specific targeting mechanisms, bioinsecticides might provide a precise and efficient way to eliminate these pests without endangering the crops.
Desire for bioinsecticides is influenced by the sizable area dedicated to growth of grains and cereals. Large-scale monoculture techniques can cause a quick rise in pest populations, raising the possibility of infestations.
With their potential to be used widely, bioinsecticides offer a workable approach for controlling pest pressures across extensive agricultural areas. At the same time, they are capable of preserving environmental integrity, which might aid demand.
Another motivating element for the use of bioinsecticides in grains and cereals is high demand for residue-free or low-residue crops. Pesticide residues found in food are subject to strict laws in several areas.
Laws are especially stringent when it comes to essentials of the human diet such as cereals and grains. Bioinsecticides fit the desire for a safer and healthier product as they frequently leave a small amount of residues and require shorter pre-harvest periods.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
Bioinsecticide manufacturers are investing in research & development to create innovative formulations that improve the stability, shelf life, and effectiveness of products. This includes encapsulation technologies, adjuvants, and delivery systems that optimize the release of active ingredients.
They are leveraging biotechnology to engineer bioinsecticides with enhanced traits such as increased specificity, quicker action, and resistance to environmental factors. Genetic modifications would enable the production of bioinsecticides tailored to target specific pests effectively.
Small-scale manufacturers are investing in educational initiatives to inform farmers, agronomists, and consumers about the benefits of using bioinsecticides. Workshops, seminars, and online resources are being utilized to demonstrate proper application methods and highlight the environmental advantages.
A handful of other companies are obtaining certifications that validate their products' safety, efficacy, and environmental impact. Certifications such as organic certifications can enhance consumer trust and facilitate market access.
For instance,
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Estimated Market Size (2023) | US$ 101.3 million |
| Projected Market Valuation (2033) | US$ 287 million |
| Value-based CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 11.0% |
| Historical Data | 2018 to 2022 |
| Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
| Quantitative Units | Value (US$ million) |
| Segments Covered | Source, Application, Region |
| Regions Covered | North America; Latin America; East Asia; South Asia Pacific; Western Europe; Eastern Europe; Middle East & Africa |
| Key Countries Covered | United States, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Italy, France, United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, GCC Countries, India, China, Japan and Australia |
| Key Companies Profiled | BASF SE; Bayer AG; Certis USA L.L.C.; Novozymes; Marrone Bio Innovations |
| Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Volume Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, Trends and Pricing Analysis |
The bioinsecticides industry is likely to top US$ 287 million in 2033.
The market is set to expand at 11.0% CAGR from 2023 to 2033.
The market exhibited a CAGR of 12.5% between 2018 and 2022.
China market is estimated to expand at a CAGR of 10.9% through 2033.
Cereals and grains segment might witness a CAGR of 10.8% from 2023 to 2033.
The United Kingdom market is expected to exceed a valuation of US$ 6.5 million by 2033.
1. Executive Summary
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Demand-side Trends
1.3. Supply-side Trends
1.4. Technology Roadmap Analysis
1.5. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Market Background
3.1. Market Dynamics
3.1.1. Drivers
3.1.2. Restraints
3.1.3. Opportunity
3.1.4. Trends
3.2. Scenario Forecast
3.2.1. Demand in Optimistic Scenario
3.2.2. Demand in Likely Scenario
3.2.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario
3.3. Opportunity Map Analysis
3.4. Product Life Cycle Analysis
3.5. Supply Chain Analysis
3.5.1. Supply Side Participants and their Roles
3.5.1.1. Producers
3.5.1.2. Mid-Level Participants (Traders/ Agents/ Brokers)
3.5.1.3. Wholesalers and Distributors
3.5.2. Value Added and Value Created at Node in the Supply Chain
3.5.3. List of Raw Material Suppliers
3.5.4. List of Existing and Potential Buyer’s
3.6. Investment Feasibility Matrix
3.7. Value Chain Analysis
3.7.1. Profit Margin Analysis
3.7.2. Wholesalers and Distributors
3.7.3. Retailers
3.8. PESTLE and Porter’s Analysis
3.9. Regulatory Landscape
3.9.1. By Key Regions
3.9.2. By Key Countries
3.10. Regional Parent Market Outlook
3.11. Production and Consumption Statistics
3.12. Import and Export Statistics
4. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033
4.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis, 2018 to 2022
4.2. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Projections, 2023 to 2033
4.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
4.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
5. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Source
5.1. Introduction / Key Findings
5.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis By Source, 2018 to 2022
5.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis and Forecast By Source, 2023 to 2033
5.3.1. Microbials
5.3.2. Plants
5.3.3. Others
5.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Source, 2018 to 2022
5.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Source, 2023 to 2033
6. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Application
6.1. Introduction / Key Findings
6.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis By Application, 2018 to 2022
6.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis and Forecast By Application, 2023 to 2033
6.3.1. Cereals & Grains
6.3.2. Oilseed and Pulses
6.3.3. Fruits and Vegetables
6.3.4. Others
6.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Application, 2018 to 2022
6.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Application, 2023 to 2033
7. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Region
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis By Region, 2018 to 2022
7.3. Current Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2023 to 2033
7.3.1. North America
7.3.2. Latin America
7.3.3. Western Europe
7.3.4. Eastern Europe
7.3.5. South Asia and Pacific
7.3.6. East Asia
7.3.7. Middle East and Africa
7.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
8. North America Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
8.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
8.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
8.2.1. By Country
8.2.1.1. United States
8.2.1.2. Canada
8.2.2. By Source
8.2.3. By Application
8.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
8.3.1. By Country
8.3.2. By Source
8.3.3. By Application
8.4. Key Takeaways
9. Latin America Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
9.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
9.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
9.2.1. By Country
9.2.1.1. Brazil
9.2.1.2. Mexico
9.2.1.3. Rest of Latin America
9.2.2. By Source
9.2.3. By Application
9.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
9.3.1. By Country
9.3.2. By Source
9.3.3. By Application
9.4. Key Takeaways
10. Western Europe Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
10.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
10.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
10.2.1. By Country
10.2.1.1. Germany
10.2.1.2. United Kingdom
10.2.1.3. France
10.2.1.4. Spain
10.2.1.5. Italy
10.2.1.6. Rest of Western Europe
10.2.2. By Source
10.2.3. By Application
10.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
10.3.1. By Country
10.3.2. By Source
10.3.3. By Application
10.4. Key Takeaways
11. Eastern Europe Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
11.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
11.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
11.2.1. By Country
11.2.1.1. Poland
11.2.1.2. Russia
11.2.1.3. Czech Republic
11.2.1.4. Romania
11.2.1.5. Rest of Eastern Europe
11.2.2. By Source
11.2.3. By Application
11.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.3.1. By Country
11.3.2. By Source
11.3.3. By Application
11.4. Key Takeaways
12. South Asia and Pacific Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
12.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
12.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
12.2.1. By Country
12.2.1.1. India
12.2.1.2. Bangladesh
12.2.1.3. Australia
12.2.1.4. New Zealand
12.2.1.5. Rest of South Asia and Pacific
12.2.2. By Source
12.2.3. By Application
12.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.3.1. By Country
12.3.2. By Source
12.3.3. By Application
12.4. Key Takeaways
13. East Asia Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
13.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
13.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
13.2.1. By Country
13.2.1.1. China
13.2.1.2. Japan
13.2.1.3. South Korea
13.2.2. By Source
13.2.3. By Application
13.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.3.1. By Country
13.3.2. By Source
13.3.3. By Application
13.4. Key Takeaways
14. Middle East and Africa Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country
14.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022
14.2. Market Size Value (US$ million) & Volume (tons) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033
14.2.1. By Country
14.2.1.1. GCC Countries
14.2.1.2. South Africa
14.2.1.3. Israel
14.2.1.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
14.2.2. By Source
14.2.3. By Application
14.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis
14.3.1. By Country
14.3.2. By Source
14.3.3. By Application
14.4. Key Takeaways
15. Key Countries Market Analysis
15.1. United States
15.1.1. Pricing Analysis
15.1.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.1.2.1. By Source
15.1.2.2. By Application
15.2. Canada
15.2.1. Pricing Analysis
15.2.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.2.2.1. By Source
15.2.2.2. By Application
15.3. Brazil
15.3.1. Pricing Analysis
15.3.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.3.2.1. By Source
15.3.2.2. By Application
15.4. Mexico
15.4.1. Pricing Analysis
15.4.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.4.2.1. By Source
15.4.2.2. By Application
15.5. Germany
15.5.1. Pricing Analysis
15.5.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.5.2.1. By Source
15.5.2.2. By Application
15.6. United Kingdom
15.6.1. Pricing Analysis
15.6.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.6.2.1. By Source
15.6.2.2. By Application
15.7. France
15.7.1. Pricing Analysis
15.7.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.7.2.1. By Source
15.7.2.2. By Application
15.8. Spain
15.8.1. Pricing Analysis
15.8.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.8.2.1. By Source
15.8.2.2. By Application
15.9. Italy
15.9.1. Pricing Analysis
15.9.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.9.2.1. By Source
15.9.2.2. By Application
15.10. Poland
15.10.1. Pricing Analysis
15.10.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.10.2.1. By Source
15.10.2.2. By Application
15.11. Russia
15.11.1. Pricing Analysis
15.11.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.11.2.1. By Source
15.11.2.2. By Application
15.12. Czech Republic
15.12.1. Pricing Analysis
15.12.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.12.2.1. By Source
15.12.2.2. By Application
15.13. Romania
15.13.1. Pricing Analysis
15.13.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.13.2.1. By Source
15.13.2.2. By Application
15.14. India
15.14.1. Pricing Analysis
15.14.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.14.2.1. By Source
15.14.2.2. By Application
15.15. Bangladesh
15.15.1. Pricing Analysis
15.15.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.15.2.1. By Source
15.15.2.2. By Application
15.16. Australia
15.16.1. Pricing Analysis
15.16.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.16.2.1. By Source
15.16.2.2. By Application
15.17. New Zealand
15.17.1. Pricing Analysis
15.17.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.17.2.1. By Source
15.17.2.2. By Application
15.18. China
15.18.1. Pricing Analysis
15.18.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.18.2.1. By Source
15.18.2.2. By Application
15.19. Japan
15.19.1. Pricing Analysis
15.19.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.19.2.1. By Source
15.19.2.2. By Application
15.20. South Korea
15.20.1. Pricing Analysis
15.20.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.20.2.1. By Source
15.20.2.2. By Application
15.21. GCC Countries
15.21.1. Pricing Analysis
15.21.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.21.2.1. By Source
15.21.2.2. By Application
15.22. South Africa
15.22.1. Pricing Analysis
15.22.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.22.2.1. By Source
15.22.2.2. By Application
15.23. Israel
15.23.1. Pricing Analysis
15.23.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022
15.23.2.1. By Source
15.23.2.2. By Application
16. Market Structure Analysis
16.1. Competition Dashboard
16.2. Competition Benchmarking
16.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
16.3.1. By Regional
16.3.2. By Source
16.3.3. By Application
17. Competition Analysis
17.1. Competition Deep Dive
17.1.1. BASF SE
17.1.1.1. Overview
17.1.1.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.1.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.1.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.1.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.1.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.2. Bayer AG
17.1.2.1. Overview
17.1.2.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.2.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.2.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.2.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.2.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.3. Certis USA L.L.C.
17.1.3.1. Overview
17.1.3.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.3.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.3.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.3.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.3.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.4. Novozymes
17.1.4.1. Overview
17.1.4.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.4.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.4.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.4.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.4.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.5. Marrone Bio Innovations
17.1.5.1. Overview
17.1.5.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.5.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.5.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.5.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.5.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.6. Syngenta
17.1.6.1. Overview
17.1.6.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.6.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.6.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.6.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.6.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.7. Nufarm
17.1.7.1. Overview
17.1.7.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.7.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.7.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.7.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.7.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.8. VALENT BioSciences
17.1.8.1. Overview
17.1.8.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.8.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.8.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.8.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.8.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.9. BioWorks
17.1.9.1. Overview
17.1.9.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.9.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.9.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.9.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.9.5.3. Channel Strategy
17.1.10. Vestaron Corporation
17.1.10.1. Overview
17.1.10.2. Product Portfolio
17.1.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments
17.1.10.4. Sales Footprint
17.1.10.5. Strategy Overview
17.1.10.5.1. Marketing Strategy
17.1.10.5.2. Product Strategy
17.1.10.5.3. Channel Strategy
18. Assumptions & Acronyms Used
19. Research Methodology
Explore Chemicals & Materials Insights
View Reports
Bioinsecticides Market
