Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market Outlook (2022 to 2032)

[250 Pages Report] The Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market was valued at around US$ 71.6 Million in 2021. With a projected CAGR of 6.1% for the next ten years, the market is likely to reach a valuation of nearly US$ 138 Million by the end of 2032.

While there has been exponential growth in the number of automobiles worldwide, the manufacturers of automotive composite leaf springs are also making investments toward making the product cost-effective and reliable.

Report Attributes Details
Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market Size (2021A) US$ 71.6 Million
Estimated Market Value (2022E) US$ 76.6 Million
Forecasted Market Value (2032F) US$ 138 Million
Global Market Growth Rate (2022 to 2032) 6.1% CAGR
North America Market Size (2021) 41.4%
United States Growth Rate (2022 to 2032) 5.3% CAGR
Key Companies Covered
  • Benteler SGL
  • Hendrickson International
  • HyperCo
  • IFC Composite GmbH
  • LiteFlex, LLC
  • Mubea Fahrwerkstechnologien GmbH
  • ARC Suspension
  • FLEX-FORM

Future Market Insights’ analysis reveals that in 2022 revenue through Composite Leaf Spring is estimated at US$ 76.6 Million. The leaf springs are used in pairs mounted longitudinally for most of the vehicles in past. However, there is an increasing number of vehicle manufacturers using single transverse-mounted leaf springs in order to reduce the cost of manufacturing the product and increase the efficiency of the vehicle.

Don't pay for what you don't need

Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!

Sales Analysis Of Automotive Composite Leaf Spring From 2017 To 2021 Vs Market Outlook For 2022 To 2032

The global market for Automotive Composite Leaf Springs expanded at a CAGR of 7% during 2017 - 2021. The steel leaf spring is one of the potential items for weight reduction in automobiles as it accounts for 10% - 20% of the unsprung weight prompting manufacturers to shift.

The composite leaf springs offer better efficiency and comfort in automobiles. Hence the sale of composite Leaf Spring will continue to increase due to the shift in the manufacturing of Automotive Leaf Spring.

The global Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market is predicted to surge ahead at a CAGR of 6.1%. The USA will continue to be the largest user of Composite Leaf Spring throughout the analysis period accounting for a US$ 46.8 Million absolute dollar opportunity in the coming 10-year period.

What Are The Key Factors Affecting The Market Dynamics Of The Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market?

The endurance of the composite leaf spring is much higher than the steel spring. The composite leaf spring is found to have 67.4% lesser stress, 64.9% higher stiffness, and 126.9% higher natural frequency than the existing steel leaf spring.

This puts the composite leaf spring way ahead of its substitutes in terms of reliability. A weight reduction of 68.2% is also achieved by using a composite leaf spring. Thus increasing the efficiency of automobiles, especially heavy commercial vehicles.

Composites are more brittle than metals and thus are more easily damaged. The cost of manufacturing the composite is high and needs complex procedures to make, which is reflected in the retail price of the composite leaf spring. Hence consumers have to brace themselves for the initial high cost which discourages potential consumers, hampering the growth of the Composite Leaf Springs Market.

Replacement of Leaf Springs is one of the factors for the revenue growth of the composite leaf springs. After 200 thousand miles, the Leaf Springs start to crack and need urgent replacement. The composite material is not reusable puts a further cost on consumers hampering revenue growth of the Composite Leaf Springs Market.

Composite materials unlike wrought metals require refrigerated transport and storage and it has a limited shelf life of about 6 months. Hence creating a supply chain for the composite product has huge costs associated with it. This challenge could be tackled by promoting local vendors, which will help reach the product worldwide and increase the revenue of composite leaf springs by reducing the cost incurred while transportation.

Nikhil Kaitwade
Nikhil Kaitwade

Principal Consultant

Talk to Analyst

Find your sweet spots for generating winning opportunities in this market.

Why Composite Leaf Spring Is An Obvious Choice For Manufacturers As Well As Consumers?

The steel Leaf Spring can be successfully replaced by composite materials for weight reduction, improved strength, and improved ride comfort without any modifications to the existing attachment to the vehicle.

Composite leaf springs have a 48% bending stress than ordinary leaf springs. In comparison to a conventional steel leaf spring, the failure duration is extended by 52%. In a traditional steel leaf spring, the strain energy storage is 14% higher. Also, its lifetime is much higher. As a result, composite Leaf Spring is more effective than traditional leaf springs and can be used as a substitute for them.

Different reinforcing fiber materials are available such as E-glass, A-glass, and S+R glass for strengthening the composite structures. Out of these materials, E-glass fiber gives better results with a nominal cost of about US$ 1.3-2 per kg. Therefore, it is considered by the manufacturer as a composite material for leaf springs.

Region-Wise Insights

Why does North America have a high demand for Automotive Leaf Springs Market?

Automotive composite leaf springs revenue in North America is estimated at US$ 31.7 Million in 2022. North America is a significant automobile production hub, which makes it the largest market for automotive composite leaf springs.

The automotive industry provides roughly 3% of the GDP in the USA. In addition, technical improvements of the new composites, such as carbon fiber composite are further augmenting the market growth. The continued progress in composite material happens to maintain competitiveness against traditional metals and plastics in North America.

Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost

Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!

Country-Wise Insights

How does the USA dominate the Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market?

United States of America is expected to account for a US$ 19 Million absolute dollar opportunity. The market in the country will account for 33.9% of the global Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market share in the coming decade.

The Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market in the country is poised to grow at a CAGR of 5.3% in the next 10 years. The USA has the highest vehicle ownership per capita in the world, with around 800 vehicles in operation per 1000 people in 2020. This prompts huge demand for composite leaf springs in the USA.

Category-Wise Insights

Why Transverse Leaf Spring Segment Takes the Lead in Composite Leaf Springs Market?

The market for composite leaf springs is dominated by the transversal category, with a CAGR of 5.9% during 2022 - 2032. Around 6.8% CAGR was achieved between 2017 and 2021. In most cases, leaf springs are used in pairs mounted longitudinally (front and back).

However, there is an increasing number of vehicle manufacturers using single transverse-mounted leaf springs. A transverse leaf spring made of composite materials offers weight reduction as well as a reduced number of elements.

For transverse leaf springs, conventional steel elements such as antiroll bar 26 mounts and links, coil springs, and two control arms are eliminated. In addition, the damping of composite structures leads to reduced transmission of vibration noise to adjacent structures making it more reliable than longitudinal leaf springs.

How did the Light Commercial Vehicle Segment perform in Composite Leaf Springs Market?

The Light Commercial Vehicle Dominates the Composite Leaf Springs Market. The market through this category is projected to witness a 5.8% CAGR during the next decade. Leaf springs give a significant amount of support between the vehicle's wheels, axles, and chassis due to the sheer number of composite layers.

The fatigue life of the composite leaf springs increased from 50 thousand times to more than 540 thousand times, while its stiffness was not degraded, which is one of the key factors for its extensive use in light commercial vehicles.

Also because of their close-meshed structure, they can absorb massive vertical stresses, which is why they are mostly utilized in light commercial vehicles. The vertical loading is also dispersed along the length of the leaf spring, rather than abruptly through a small spring and damper, which could result in a concentrated force that is too strong for the suspension.

Competitive Landscape

At present, Automotive Composite Leaf Spring manufacturers are largely aiming at product innovation and commercialization. Also focusing on strategic mergers for better brand recognition.

The key companies operating in the Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market include Benteler SGL, Hendrickson International, HyperCo, IFC Composite GmbH, LiteFlex, LLC, Mubea Fahrwerkstechnologien GmbH, ARC Suspension, FLEX-FORM, Heathcote Industrial Plastics, Hendrickson Holding LLC, KraussMaffei, Jamna Auto Industries Ltd, Standens, NHK Spring, Mitsubishi Steel, Owen Spring, Beijer Alma, Fangda, Dongfeng, Rassini International.

Some of the recent developments by key providers of the Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market are as follows:

  • In Oct 2021, AOC AG developed TUCANA, a new sheet molding compound under the UK government-funded research project, along with Astar. It is based on Daron polyurethane hybrid technology that enables the production of chopped carbon fiber molded parts on an industrial scale. It has the manufacturing ease of unsaturated polyester resin and vinyl ester resin SMC and the mechanical performance of epoxy resin CF-SMC.
  • In Jul 2021, Hexcel’s HexPly M901 prepreg system has been selected by Rassini, to speed up a prototype and new product development cycles. The company aims to reduce overall time to market with the easy-to-process material that enables effective early-stage design screening and cost-effective production.
  • In Jun 2021, Rassini specified the use of an EPIKOTE epoxy resin system from Hexion Inc. for the rear suspension system installed in Ford Motor Co’s new pickup truck model.
  • In October 2019, Hendrickson completed the acquisition of Dayton, Ohio-based Liteflex Composite Springs. Under the name Hendrickson Composites, the company will operate as a branch of Hendrickson. Hendrickson's product folio is bolstered with more composite spring technology.

Similarly, recent developments related to companies manufacturing Automotive Composite Leaf Springs have been tracked by the team at Future Market Insights, which is available in the full report.

Key Segments Covered In Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market Survey

Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market by Installation Type:

  • Transversal
  • Longitudinal

Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market by Process Type:

  • High-Pressure Resin Transfer Molding Process
  • Prepreg Layup Process
  • Others

Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market by Location Type:

  • Front Leaf Spring
  • Rear Leaf Spring

Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market by Vehicle Type:

  • Passenger Car
  • Light Commercial Vehicle
  • Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles

Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market by Region:

  • North America Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market
  • Latin America Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market
  • Europe Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market
  • Asia Pacific Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market
  • Middle East & Africa Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market

Frequently Asked Questions

How much is the global Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market currently worth?

The global Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market was valued at US$ 71.6 Million in 2021.

What is the Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market Forecast through 2032?

The Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market is set to witness a growth rate of 6.1% over the forecast period and be valued at US$ 138 Million by 2032.

At what rate did demand for Automotive Composite Leaf Spring increase over the past 5 years?

The Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market expanded at 6.1% from 2017 through 2021.

Which are the key players shaping the Automotive Composite Leaf Spring industry?

ARC Suspension, FLEX-FORM, Heathcote Industrial Plastics, Hendrickson Holding LLC, and KraussMaffei are the key companies in the Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market.

Which are the top 5 countries driving the highest sales of Automotive Composite Leaf Spring?

United States, United Kingdom, China, Japan, and South Korea are expected to drive the most sales growth of Automotive Composite Leaf Spring.

What is the China market outlook for Automotive Composite Leaf Spring?

The Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market in China is projected to witness a CAGR of 5.1% from 2022 to 2032.

Table of Content

1. Executive Summary | Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market

    1.1. Global Market Outlook

    1.2. Demand-side Trends

    1.3. Supply-side Trends

    1.4. Technology Roadmap Analysis

    1.5. Analysis and Recommendations

2. Market Overview

    2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy

    2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations

3. Market Background

    3.1. Market Dynamics

        3.1.1. Drivers

        3.1.2. Restraints

        3.1.3. Opportunity

        3.1.4. Trends

    3.2. Scenario Forecast

        3.2.1. Demand in Optimistic Scenario

        3.2.2. Demand in Likely Scenario

        3.2.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario

    3.3. Opportunity Map Analysis

    3.4. Investment Feasibility Matrix

    3.5. PESTLE and Porter’s Analysis

    3.6. Regulatory Landscape

        3.6.1. By Key Regions

        3.6.2. By Key Countries

    3.7. Regional Parent Market Outlook

4. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast, 2022 to 2032

    4.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis, 2017 to 2021

    4.2. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Projections, 2022 to 2032

        4.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis

        4.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis

5. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Installation Type

    5.1. Introduction / Key Findings

    5.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis By Installation Type, 2017 to 2021

    5.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis and Forecast By Installation Type, 2022 to 2032

        5.3.1. Transversal

        5.3.2. Longitudinal

    5.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Installation Type, 2017 to 2021

    5.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Installation Type, 2022 to 2032

6. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Process Type

    6.1. Introduction / Key Findings

    6.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis By Process Type, 2017 to 2021

    6.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis and Forecast By Process Type, 2022 to 2032

        6.3.1. High-Pressure Resin Transfer Molding Process

        6.3.2. Prepreg Layup Process

        6.3.3. Others

    6.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Process Type, 2017 to 2021

    6.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Process Type, 2022 to 2032

7. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Location Type

    7.1. Introduction / Key Findings

    7.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis By Location Type, 2017 to 2021

    7.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis and Forecast By Location Type, 2022 to 2032

        7.3.1. Front Leaf Spring

        7.3.2. Rear Leaf Spring

    7.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Location Type, 2017 to 2021

    7.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Location Type, 2022 to 2032

8. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Vehicle Type

    8.1. Introduction / Key Findings

    8.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis By Vehicle Type, 2017 to 2021

    8.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis and Forecast By Vehicle Type, 2022 to 2032

        8.3.1. Passenger Car

        8.3.2. Light Commercial Vehicle

        8.3.3. Medium And Heavy Duty Vehicles

    8.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Vehicle Type, 2017 to 2021

    8.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Vehicle Type, 2022 to 2032

9. Global Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Region

    9.1. Introduction

    9.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis By Region, 2017 to 2021

    9.3. Current Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2022 to 2032

        9.3.1. North America

        9.3.2. Latin America

        9.3.3. Europe

        9.3.4. Asia Pacific

        9.3.5. Middle East and Africa (MEA)

    9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region

10. North America Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Country

    10.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021

    10.2. Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032

        10.2.1. By Country

            10.2.1.1. United Kingdom

            10.2.1.2. Canada

        10.2.2. By Installation Type

        10.2.3. By Process Type

        10.2.4. By Location Type

        10.2.5. By Vehicle Type

    10.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis

        10.3.1. By Country

        10.3.2. By Installation Type

        10.3.3. By Process Type

        10.3.4. By Location Type

        10.3.5. By Vehicle Type

    10.4. Key Takeaways

11. Latin America Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Country

    11.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021

    11.2. Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032

        11.2.1. By Country

            11.2.1.1. Brazil

            11.2.1.2. Mexico

            11.2.1.3. Rest of Latin America

        11.2.2. By Installation Type

        11.2.3. By Process Type

        11.2.4. By Location Type

        11.2.5. By Vehicle Type

    11.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis

        11.3.1. By Country

        11.3.2. By Installation Type

        11.3.3. By Process Type

        11.3.4. By Location Type

        11.3.5. By Vehicle Type

    11.4. Key Takeaways

12. Europe Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Country

    12.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021

    12.2. Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032

        12.2.1. By Country

            12.2.1.1. Germany

            12.2.1.2. United Kingdom

            12.2.1.3. France

            12.2.1.4. Spain

            12.2.1.5. Italy

            12.2.1.6. Rest of Europe

        12.2.2. By Installation Type

        12.2.3. By Process Type

        12.2.4. By Location Type

        12.2.5. By Vehicle Type

    12.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis

        12.3.1. By Country

        12.3.2. By Installation Type

        12.3.3. By Process Type

        12.3.4. By Location Type

        12.3.5. By Vehicle Type

    12.4. Key Takeaways

13. Asia Pacific Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Country

    13.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021

    13.2. Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032

        13.2.1. By Country

            13.2.1.1. China

            13.2.1.2. Japan

            13.2.1.3. South Korea

            13.2.1.4. Malaysia

            13.2.1.5. Singapore

            13.2.1.6. Australia

            13.2.1.7. Rest of Asia Pacific

        13.2.2. By Installation Type

        13.2.3. By Process Type

        13.2.4. By Location Type

        13.2.5. By Vehicle Type

    13.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis

        13.3.1. By Country

        13.3.2. By Installation Type

        13.3.3. By Process Type

        13.3.4. By Location Type

        13.3.5. By Vehicle Type

    13.4. Key Takeaways

14. MEA Market Analysis 2017 to 2021 and Forecast 2022 to 2032, By Country

    14.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017 to 2021

    14.2. Market Size Value (US$ Billion) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022 to 2032

        14.2.1. By Country

            14.2.1.1. GCC Countries

            14.2.1.2. South Africa

            14.2.1.3. Israel

            14.2.1.4. Rest of MEA

        14.2.2. By Installation Type

        14.2.3. By Process Type

        14.2.4. By Location Type

        14.2.5. By Vehicle Type

    14.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis

        14.3.1. By Country

        14.3.2. By Installation Type

        14.3.3. By Process Type

        14.3.4. By Location Type

        14.3.5. By Vehicle Type

    14.4. Key Takeaways

15. Key Countries Market Analysis

    15.1. United Kingdom

        15.1.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.1.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.1.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.1.2.2. By Process Type

            15.1.2.3. By Location Type

            15.1.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.2. Canada

        15.2.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.2.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.2.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.2.2.2. By Process Type

            15.2.2.3. By Location Type

            15.2.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.3. Brazil

        15.3.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.3.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.3.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.3.2.2. By Process Type

            15.3.2.3. By Location Type

            15.3.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.4. Mexico

        15.4.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.4.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.4.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.4.2.2. By Process Type

            15.4.2.3. By Location Type

            15.4.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.5. Rest of Latin America

        15.5.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.5.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.5.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.5.2.2. By Process Type

            15.5.2.3. By Location Type

            15.5.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.6. Germany

        15.6.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.6.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.6.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.6.2.2. By Process Type

            15.6.2.3. By Location Type

            15.6.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.7. United Kingdom

        15.7.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.7.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.7.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.7.2.2. By Process Type

            15.7.2.3. By Location Type

            15.7.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.8. France

        15.8.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.8.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.8.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.8.2.2. By Process Type

            15.8.2.3. By Location Type

            15.8.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.9. Spain

        15.9.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.9.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.9.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.9.2.2. By Process Type

            15.9.2.3. By Location Type

            15.9.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.10. Italy

        15.10.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.10.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.10.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.10.2.2. By Process Type

            15.10.2.3. By Location Type

            15.10.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.11. Rest of Europe

        15.11.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.11.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.11.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.11.2.2. By Process Type

            15.11.2.3. By Location Type

            15.11.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.12. China

        15.12.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.12.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.12.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.12.2.2. By Process Type

            15.12.2.3. By Location Type

            15.12.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.13. Japan

        15.13.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.13.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.13.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.13.2.2. By Process Type

            15.13.2.3. By Location Type

            15.13.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.14. South Korea

        15.14.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.14.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.14.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.14.2.2. By Process Type

            15.14.2.3. By Location Type

            15.14.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.15. Malaysia

        15.15.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.15.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.15.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.15.2.2. By Process Type

            15.15.2.3. By Location Type

            15.15.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.16. Singapore

        15.16.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.16.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.16.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.16.2.2. By Process Type

            15.16.2.3. By Location Type

            15.16.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.17. Australia

        15.17.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.17.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.17.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.17.2.2. By Process Type

            15.17.2.3. By Location Type

            15.17.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.18. Rest of Asia Pacific

        15.18.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.18.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.18.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.18.2.2. By Process Type

            15.18.2.3. By Location Type

            15.18.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.19. GCC Countries

        15.19.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.19.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.19.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.19.2.2. By Process Type

            15.19.2.3. By Location Type

            15.19.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.20. South Africa

        15.20.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.20.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.20.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.20.2.2. By Process Type

            15.20.2.3. By Location Type

            15.20.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.21. Israel

        15.21.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.21.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.21.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.21.2.2. By Process Type

            15.21.2.3. By Location Type

            15.21.2.4. By Vehicle Type

    15.22. Rest of MEA

        15.22.1. Pricing Analysis

        15.22.2. Market Share Analysis, 2021

            15.22.2.1. By Installation Type

            15.22.2.2. By Process Type

            15.22.2.3. By Location Type

            15.22.2.4. By Vehicle Type

16. Market Structure Analysis

    16.1. Competition Dashboard

    16.2. Competition Benchmarking

    16.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players

        16.3.1. By Regional

        16.3.2. By Installation Type

        16.3.3. By Process Type

        16.3.4. By Location Type

        16.3.5. By Vehicle Type

17. Competition Analysis

    17.1. Competition Deep Dive

        17.1.1. ARC Suspension

            17.1.1.1. Overview

            17.1.1.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.1.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.1.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.2. FLEX-FORM

            17.1.2.1. Overview

            17.1.2.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.2.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.2.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.3. Heathcote Industrial Plastics

            17.1.3.1. Overview

            17.1.3.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.3.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.3.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.4. Hendrickson Holding LLC

            17.1.4.1. Overview

            17.1.4.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.4.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.4.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.5. KraussMaffei

            17.1.5.1. Overview

            17.1.5.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.5.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.5.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.6. M.W. Industries

            17.1.6.1. Overview

            17.1.6.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.6.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.6.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.7. MUBEA

            17.1.7.1. Overview

            17.1.7.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.7.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.7.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.8. OlgunCelik

            17.1.8.1. Overview

            17.1.8.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.8.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.8.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.9. SGL Carbon

            17.1.9.1. Overview

            17.1.9.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.9.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.9.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy

        17.1.10. Arup

            17.1.10.1. Overview

            17.1.10.2. Product Portfolio

            17.1.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments

            17.1.10.4. Sales Footprint

            17.1.10.5. Strategy Overview

                17.1.10.5.1. Marketing Strategy

18. Assumptions & Acronyms Used

19. Research Methodology

Explore Automotive Insights

View Reports
Future Market Insights

Automotive Composite Leaf Springs Market

Schedule a Call